Suppr超能文献

休克而非血压或休克指数决定穿透性创伤后进行胸部损伤控制的必要性。

Shock, Not Blood Pressure or Shock Index, Determines the Need for Thoracic Damage Control Following Penetrating Trauma.

作者信息

Deane Molly, Galvagno Samuel M, Moran Benjamin, Stein Deborah M, Scalea Thomas M, O'Connor James V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.

Department of Anesthesia, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

出版信息

Shock. 2020 Jul;54(1):4-8. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001472.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Damage control laparotomy has increased survival for critically injured patient with penetrating abdominal trauma. There has been a slower adoption of a damage control strategy for thoracic trauma despite the considerable mortality associated with emergent thoracotomy for patients in profound shock. We postulated admission physiology, not blood pressure or shock index, would identify patients who would benefit from thoracic damage control.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective trauma registry review from 2002 to 2017 at a busy, urban trauma center. Three hundred one patients with penetrating thoracic trauma operated on within 6 h of admission were identified. Of those 66 (21.9%) required thoracic damage control and comprise the study population.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-damage control group, the 66 damage control patients had significantly higher Injury Severity Score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale, lactate and base deficit, and lower pH and temperature. In addition, the damage control thoracic surgery group had significantly more gunshot wounds, transfusions, concomitant laparotomies, vasoactive infusions, and shorter time to the operating room. Notably, however, there were no significant differences in admission systolic blood pressure or shock index between the groups. Once normal physiology was restored, chest closure was performed 1.7 (0.7) days after the index operation. Mortality for thoracic damage was 15.2%, significantly higher than the 4.3% in the non-damage control group. Over two-thirds of damage control deaths occurred prior to chest closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality in this series of severely injured, profoundly physiologically altered patients undergoing thoracic damage control is substantially lower than previously reported. Rather than relying on blood pressure and shock index, early recognition of shock identifies patients in whom thoracic damage control is beneficial.

摘要

背景

损伤控制剖腹术提高了穿透性腹部创伤的重伤患者的生存率。尽管对于处于深度休克的患者,急诊开胸手术有相当高的死亡率,但损伤控制策略在胸外伤中的应用却较为缓慢。我们推测入院时的生理指标,而非血压或休克指数,能够识别出可从胸部损伤控制中获益的患者。

研究设计

对一家繁忙的城市创伤中心2002年至2017年的创伤登记资料进行回顾性研究。确定了301例入院后6小时内接受穿透性胸外伤手术的患者。其中66例(21.9%)需要进行胸部损伤控制,构成研究人群。

结果

与非损伤控制组相比,66例接受损伤控制的患者的损伤严重程度评分、胸部简明损伤定级、乳酸水平和碱缺失显著更高,而pH值和体温更低。此外,损伤控制胸外科手术组的枪伤、输血、同期剖腹手术、血管活性药物输注更多,且到达手术室的时间更短。然而,值得注意的是,两组之间入院时的收缩压或休克指数并无显著差异。一旦生理指标恢复正常,在首次手术后1.7(0.7)天进行胸部闭合。胸部损伤控制的死亡率为15.2%,显著高于非损伤控制组的4.3%。超过三分之二的损伤控制死亡发生在胸部闭合之前。

结论

在这一系列接受胸部损伤控制的严重受伤、生理状态严重改变的患者中,死亡率显著低于先前报道。早期识别休克而非依赖血压和休克指数,能够确定可从胸部损伤控制中获益的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验