Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Arizona Smokers' Helpline, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(3):452-459. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1683204. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
High rates of smoking are documented among some American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities, with potential variability by region and urban/rural settings. Quitlines are a cost-effective strategy for providing evidence-based cessation treatment, but little is known about the effectiveness of quitline services for the AI/AN population. This study compared demographic characteristics, tobacco use, and cessation and program utilization behaviors between AI/AN ( = 297) and Non-Hispanic White (NHW; = 13,497) quitline callers. The study also identified predictors of 30-day cessation at 7-month follow-up among AI/AN callers and determined if predictors were different between AI/AN and NHW callers. Data from callers to the Arizona Smokers' Helpline between January 2011 and June 2016 were analyzed. At enrollment, AI/AN callers were less likely to use tobacco daily and were less dependent on nicotine compared to NHW callers. Both groups reported similar rates of 30-day cessation at 7-month follow-up (37.3% and 39.7% for AI/AN and NHW callers, respectively). For AI/AN callers, 30-day cessation was significantly associated with tobacco cessation medication use (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.02-4.93), number of coaching sessions (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.26), and other smokers in the home (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19-0.91). The effect of other smokers in the home was significantly different between AI/AN and NHW callers ( = .007). Different individual characteristics and predictors of cessation among AI/AN callers compared to NHW callers were documented. Findings may be used to inform the development of culturally-tailored strategies and protocols for AI/AN quitline callers.
一些美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)社区的吸烟率很高,且不同地区和城乡环境的吸烟率存在潜在差异。戒烟热线是提供基于证据的戒烟治疗的一种具有成本效益的策略,但对于 AI/AN 人群来说,对戒烟热线服务的有效性知之甚少。本研究比较了 AI/AN( = 297)和非西班牙裔白人(NHW; = 13,497)戒烟热线来电者的人口统计学特征、烟草使用情况以及戒烟和项目利用行为。该研究还确定了 AI/AN 来电者在 7 个月随访时 30 天戒烟的预测因素,并确定了这些预测因素在 AI/AN 和 NHW 来电者之间是否不同。对 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月期间拨打亚利桑那州吸烟者帮助热线的来电者的数据进行了分析。在入组时,与 NHW 来电者相比,AI/AN 来电者每日吸烟的可能性较低,对尼古丁的依赖程度也较低。两组在 7 个月随访时的 30 天戒烟率相似(AI/AN 来电者为 37.3%,NHW 来电者为 39.7%)。对于 AI/AN 来电者,30 天戒烟与使用戒烟药物(OR = 2.24,95%CI:1.02-4.93)、咨询次数(OR = 1.14,95%CI:1.04-1.26)和家中其他吸烟者(OR = 0.41,95%CI:0.19-0.91)显著相关。家中其他吸烟者的影响在 AI/AN 和 NHW 来电者之间存在显著差异( = .007)。与 NHW 来电者相比,AI/AN 来电者有不同的个体特征和戒烟预测因素。这些发现可能被用于为 AI/AN 戒烟热线来电者制定文化上适当的策略和方案。