Rusch P, Ind T, Kimmig R, Maggioni A, Ponce J, Zanagnolo V, Coronado P J, Verguts J, Lambaudie E, Falconer H, Collins J W, Verheijen Rhm
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Duisburg-Essen; Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany. Email:
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Marsden, London, UK.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Mar;11(1):29-41.
The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) aims at developing a European consensus on core components of a curriculum for training and assessment in robot assisted gynaecological surgery.
A Delphi process was initiated among a panel of 12 experts in robot assisted surgery invited through the SERGS. An online questionnaire survey was based on a literature search for standards in education in gynaecological robot assisted surgery. The survey was performed in three consecutive rounds to reach optimal consensus. The results of this survey were discussed by the panel and led to consensus recommendations on 39 issues, adhering to general principles of medical education.
On review there appeared to be no accredited training programs in Europe, and few in the USA. Recommendations for requirements of training centres, educational tools and assessment of proficiency varied widely. Stepwise and structured training together with validated assessment based on competencies rather than on volume emerged as prerequisites for adequate and safe learning. An appropriate educational environment and tools for training were defined. Although certification should be competence based, the panel recommended additional volume based criteria for both accreditation of training centres and certification of individual surgeons.
Consensus was reached on minimum criteria for training in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. To transfer results into clinical practice, experts recommended a curriculum and guidelines that have now been endorsed by SERGS to be used to establish training programmes for robot assisted surgery.
欧洲机器人妇科手术学会(SERGS)旨在就机器人辅助妇科手术培训与评估课程的核心组成部分达成欧洲共识。
通过SERGS邀请了12名机器人辅助手术专家组成的小组启动了德尔菲法。在线问卷调查基于对妇科机器人辅助手术教育标准的文献检索。该调查连续进行三轮以达成最佳共识。专家小组讨论了此次调查的结果,并根据医学教育的一般原则就39个问题达成了共识性建议。
经审查发现欧洲似乎没有经认可的培训项目,美国也很少。关于培训中心要求、教育工具和熟练程度评估的建议差异很大。逐步和结构化的培训以及基于能力而非手术量的有效评估成为充分且安全学习的先决条件。定义了合适的教育环境和培训工具。尽管认证应以能力为基础,但专家小组建议对培训中心的认证和个体外科医生的认证采用额外的基于手术量的标准。
就机器人辅助妇科手术培训的最低标准达成了共识。为将结果转化为临床实践,专家们推荐了一门课程和指南,现已得到SERGS的认可,用于建立机器人辅助手术的培训项目。