• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估测试效应为何受到实验设计的调节。

Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(7):1293-1308. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000787. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000787
PMID:31697142
Abstract

The testing effect is 1 of several memory effects moderated by experimental design, such that the effect on free recall is larger in a mixed-list than pure-list design (Mulligan, Susser, & Smith, 2016). The current experiments assess hypotheses regarding why this pattern is found. Three extant accounts of design effects (Nguyen & McDaniel, 2015) are the item-order account, the retrieval-distinctiveness account, and the rehearsal-borrowing account. Three experiments contrasted these accounts, finding support for rehearsal borrowing but no evidence for the rehearsal-distinctiveness or item-order accounts. In addition, each experiment found that the testing effect was larger in the mixed-list than pure-list condition, attesting to the replicability of the design-moderation pattern for the testing effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

测试效应是受实验设计调节的几种记忆效应之一,例如,在混合列表设计中,自由回忆的效果比纯列表设计更大(Mulligan、Susser 和 Smith,2016)。当前的实验评估了关于为什么会出现这种模式的假设。关于设计效果的三个现有解释(Nguyen 和 McDaniel,2015)是项目顺序解释、检索独特性解释和复述借用解释。三项实验对这些解释进行了对比,发现复述借用解释得到了支持,而没有证据支持检索独特性或项目顺序解释。此外,每项实验都发现,在混合列表中,测试效应大于纯列表条件,证明了测试效应的设计调节模式具有可重复性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design.评估测试效应为何受到实验设计的调节。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(7):1293-1308. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000787. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.阴性测试效应的可重复性:不同参与者群体之间的差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):752-763. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000490. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?长列表回忆中的产生效应:顺序无关紧要?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/cep0000086.
4
In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting.支持选择性复述:项目-方法导向遗忘中的双项目呈现。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):529-535. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01723-w.
5
Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.绘图增强了记忆中的项目信息,但破坏了序列信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):689-699. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000610. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
The generation effect and experimental design.生成效应和实验设计。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Aug;45(8):1422-1431. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000663. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.订单信息用于指导长列表的回忆:项目顺序理论的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):125-38. doi: 10.1037/cep0000088.
8
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.绘图效应:使用纯列表和混合列表的成本和收益证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
The list-length effect occurs in cued recall with the retroactive design but not the proactive design.列表长度效应在采用追溯设计的线索回忆中会出现,但在采用前瞻设计时不会出现。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Mar;74(1):12-24. doi: 10.1037/cep0000187. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.就特定项目信息和关联信息而言的负性和正性测试效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):859-71. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000056. Epub 2014 Sep 1.