• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊次全切除术:早期和长期结果。

Subtotal cholecystectomy: early and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary (HPB) Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4536-4542. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07242-7. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-07242-7
PMID:31701285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In difficult gallbladders, partial or subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) has been described as a reasonable procedure with safe outcomes. Our aim was to look at our data on SC with respect to safety, morbidity and long-term outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for 3560 patients undergoing cholecystectomy from January 2010 to June 2016. For patients who underwent SC, demographics, intra-operative and follow-up details were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 SC patients were included. 102 (60.7%) were male while 66 (39.3%) were female. The median age was 63 years (31-87). These patients were on follow-up for a median of 29 months (1.7-80). 153 were attempted laparoscopically and there were 25 (16.3%) patients which had open conversion. The rest of the 15 patients had open SC. Mean operative time 150 min (70-315) and average blood loss was 170 ml (50-1500). Median length of stay for these patients was 4 days (1-68). There were no common bile duct (CBD) injuries. We had 12 (7.1%) post-operative collections, 4 (2.4%) wound infections, 1 (0.6%) bile leak and 7 (4.2%) retained stones. Post-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed on 4 (2.4%) patients with successful retrieval of CBD stones. One patient has spontaneous passage of CBD stone. The rest of the two patients with very small retained stones in remnant gallbladder were successfully managed conservatively. There was no 30-day or operation-related mortality. No patient required a second operation.

CONCLUSIONS

SC is safe and feasible when encountering a difficult gallbladder.

摘要

背景

在困难的胆囊中,部分或次全胆囊切除术(SC)已被描述为一种安全的手术方法,具有良好的结果。我们的目的是观察我们关于 SC 的数据,以了解安全性、发病率和长期结果。

方法

对 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月期间行胆囊切除术的 3560 例患者进行回顾性分析。对接受 SC 的患者,分析其人口统计学、术中及随访细节。

结果

共纳入 168 例 SC 患者。男 102 例(60.7%),女 66 例(39.3%)。中位年龄 63 岁(31-87 岁)。这些患者的中位随访时间为 29 个月(1.7-80 个月)。153 例患者行腹腔镜尝试,其中 25 例(16.3%)患者转为开腹。其余 15 例患者行开腹 SC。平均手术时间 150 分钟(70-315 分钟),平均出血量 170ml(50-1500ml)。这些患者的中位住院时间为 4 天(1-68 天)。无胆总管(CBD)损伤。我们有 12 例(7.1%)术后积液,4 例(2.4%)伤口感染,1 例(0.6%)胆漏,7 例(4.2%)残余结石。4 例(2.4%)患者术后行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),成功取出 CBD 结石。1 例患者 CBD 结石自行排出。其余两名患者残余胆囊内有非常小的残余结石,经保守治疗成功。无 30 天或手术相关死亡率。无患者需要再次手术。

结论

在遇到困难的胆囊时,SC 是安全可行的。

相似文献

1
Subtotal cholecystectomy: early and long-term outcomes.胆囊次全切除术:早期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4536-4542. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07242-7. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial.单阶段腹腔镜胆总管探查术及胆囊切除术与两阶段内镜下取石术继以腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗合并胆囊结石和胆总管结石患者的随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):875-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3237-4. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
The fate of patients who undergo "preoperative" ERCP to clear known or suspected bile duct stones.接受“术前”内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)以清除已知或疑似胆管结石的患者的预后。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):74-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9903-2. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
4
One-Session Laparoscopic Management of Combined Common Bile Duct and Gallbladder Stones Versus Sequential ERCP Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.一期腹腔镜治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石与序贯内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):482-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0582. Epub 2015 May 7.
5
The second 'gallbladder operation'.第二次“胆囊手术”。
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(4):596-602. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_314_21.
6
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the presence of common bile duct stent.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)置放胆管支架后的择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1185-9. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
8
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Jun;64(6):407-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02240.x.
9
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
10
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholecystectomy in the Context of Cirrhosis, Sclero-Atrophic Cholecystitis, and Gangrenous Cholecystitis: A Literature Review.肝硬化、硬化萎缩性胆囊炎和坏疽性胆囊炎背景下的胆囊切除术:文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 22;61(8):1314. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081314.
2
Fenestrating Versus Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Bile Leak, Bile Duct Injury, and Outcomes.开窗式与重建式次全胆囊切除术:关于胆漏、胆管损伤及手术结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72769. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Surgical Options for Retained Gallstones After Cholecystectomy.
胆囊切除术后残留胆结石的手术选择
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Dec 1;34(6):625-629. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001333.
4
Open versus laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy in patients with previous open partial cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study.既往接受开腹部分胆囊切除术患者的开腹与腹腔镜胆囊切除完成手术:一项回顾性比较研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 6;86(10):5688-5695. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002428. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Converting From Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Its Advantages and Reasoning.从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术:对其优势及原因的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64694. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64694. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Mirizzi Syndrome-The Past, Present, and Future.Mirizzi综合征——过去、现在与未来
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 21;60(1):12. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010012.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis of fenestrating and reconstituting approaches in 170 cases.腹腔镜次全胆囊切除术的疗效:170例开窗与重建方法的对比分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1484-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10652-3. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
Type I Mirizzi syndrome treated by electrohydraulic lithotripsy under the direct view of SpyGlass: A case report.经SpyGlass直视下液电碎石术治疗Ⅰ型Mirizzi综合征:1例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jul 26;11(21):5115-5121. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i21.5115.
9
State of the art in subtotal cholecystectomy: An overview.次全胆囊切除术的现状:综述
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 21;10:1142579. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1142579. eCollection 2023.
10
Should Procalcitonin Be Included in Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines? A Systematic Review.降钙素原是否应纳入急性胆囊炎指南?系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 20;59(4):805. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040805.