• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关怀之年方法:在一般实践中为长期疾病的护理和支持计划制定模型和交付方案。

The Year of Care approach: developing a model and delivery programme for care and support planning in long term conditions within general practice.

机构信息

Year of Care Partnerships, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland, NE63 9JJ, England.

Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, England.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1042-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-019-1042-4
PMID:31703620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6839214/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with long term conditions (LTCs) make most of the daily decisions and carry out the activities which affect their health and quality of life. Only a fraction of each contact with a health care professional (HCP) is spent supporting this. This paper describes how care and support planning (CSP) and an implementation framework to redesign services, were developed to address this in UK general practice. Focussed on what is important to each individual, CSP brings together traditional clinical issues and the person's lived experience in a solution focussed, forward looking conversation with an emphasis on 'people not diseases'.

METHODS

The components of CSP were developed in three health communities using diabetes as an exemplar. This model was extended and refined for other single conditions and multimorbidity across 40 sites and two nations, over 15 years. Working with local teams and communities the authors used theoretical models of care, implementation and spread, developing and tailoring training, support and resources to embed CSP as usual care, sharing learning across a community of practice.

RESULTS

The purpose, content, process, developmental hurdles and impact of this CSP model are described, alongside an implementation strategy. There is now a robust, reproducible five step model; preparation, conversation, recording, actions and review. Uniquely, preparation, involving information sharing with time for reflection, enables an uncluttered conversation with a professional focussed on what is important to each person. The components of the Year of Care House act as a checklist for implementation, a metaphor for their interdependence and a flexible framework. Spreading CSP involved developing exemplar practices and building capacity across local health communities. These reported improved patient experience, practitioner job satisfaction, health behaviours and outcomes, teamwork, practice organisation, resource use, and links with wider community activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Tested in multiple settings, CSP is a reproducible and practical model of planned care applicable to all LTCs, with the capacity to be transformative for people with LTCs and health care professionals. It recaptures relational dimensions of care with transactional elements in the background. Options for applying this model and implementation framework at scale now need to be explored.

摘要

背景

患有长期疾病(LTCs)的人做出了大部分影响其健康和生活质量的日常决策并开展相关活动。但在与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的每次接触中,只有一小部分用于支持这些决策和活动。本文描述了如何制定护理和支持计划(CSP)以及实施框架来重新设计服务,以解决英国全科医生面临的这一问题。CSP 关注于每个人的重要事项,将传统的临床问题和个人的生活体验汇集在一起,形成以解决方案为重点、着眼未来的对话,强调“以人为本而非以疾病为本”。

方法

CSP 的组成部分是在三个健康社区中使用糖尿病作为范例开发的。该模型在 15 年中扩展到两个国家的 40 个地点的其他单一疾病和多种合并症,并进行了改进和完善。作者与当地团队和社区合作,使用护理、实施和传播的理论模型,开发并调整培训、支持和资源,将 CSP 作为常规护理进行嵌入,并在实践社区中分享学习经验。

结果

本文描述了该 CSP 模型的目的、内容、流程、发展障碍和影响,以及实施策略。现在有一个稳健、可重复的五步模型:准备、对话、记录、行动和审查。独特的是,准备工作涉及信息共享和时间反思,为与专业人员进行无干扰的对话创造了条件,而对话则侧重于每个人的重要事项。年度护理之屋的各个组成部分可作为实施的清单、相互依存的隐喻以及灵活的框架。推广 CSP 涉及开发范例实践和建立当地卫生社区的能力。这报告称,患者体验、从业者工作满意度、健康行为和结果、团队合作、实践组织、资源利用以及与更广泛的社区活动的联系都得到了改善。

结论

在多个环境中进行测试后,CSP 是一种可复制和实用的计划性护理模式,适用于所有 LTCs,有潜力为患有 LTCs 的患者和医疗保健专业人员带来变革。它重新捕捉了护理的关系维度,并在背景中融入了交易元素。现在需要探索在更大范围内应用这种模式和实施框架的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/caa7236b19dc/12875_2019_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/eccd873b11d3/12875_2019_1042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/15b24fea8d41/12875_2019_1042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/420226c14983/12875_2019_1042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/caa7236b19dc/12875_2019_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/eccd873b11d3/12875_2019_1042_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/15b24fea8d41/12875_2019_1042_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/420226c14983/12875_2019_1042_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/6839214/caa7236b19dc/12875_2019_1042_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Year of Care approach: developing a model and delivery programme for care and support planning in long term conditions within general practice.关怀之年方法:在一般实践中为长期疾病的护理和支持计划制定模型和交付方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1042-4.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
4
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
5
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team.针对患有多种慢性病患者的服务创新:一个快速评估团队的思考
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(15):1-76. doi: 10.3310/PTRU7108.
9
10
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers and barriers to promoting self-care in individuals living with multiple long-term health conditions: a cross-sectional online survey of health and care professionals.促进患有多种长期健康状况的个体进行自我护理的驱动因素和障碍:对健康与护理专业人员的横断面在线调查
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21737-0.
2
Stigma and the Inverse Care Law: Experiences of 'Care' for People Living in Marginalised Conditions.耻辱感与逆向医疗法则:边缘化群体的“就医”经历
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan;47(1):e70000. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70000.
3
Telephone consulting for 'Personalised Care and Support Planning' with people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences during COVID-19 restrictions and beyond.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of a community-based social prescribing intervention on people with type 2 diabetes in North East England: mixed-methods study protocol.评价基于社区的社会处方干预对英格兰东北部 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):e026826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026826.
2
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).改进复杂干预措施的规范化:第 2 部分 - 基于规范进程理论(NPT)评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具的验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x.
3
电话咨询“个性化护理和支持计划”在长期病患者中的应用:一项在 COVID-19 限制期间及之后,针对医疗保健专业人员的经验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 31;25(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02443-z.
4
Spousal Involvement in Collaborative Management and Glycemic Behavior Change among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.配偶参与糖尿病患者的协作管理及血糖行为改变:一项系统综述
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Apr 18;10:23779608241245196. doi: 10.1177/23779608241245196. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Personalised care and support planning in Singapore: qualitative interviews with people living with diabetes.新加坡的个性化护理与支持计划:对糖尿病患者的定性访谈
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0055. Print 2024 Apr.
6
Implementing and evaluating care and support planning: a qualitative study of health professionals' experiences in public polyclinics in Singapore.实施和评估护理和支持计划:新加坡公立综合诊疗所卫生专业人员经验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 19;24(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02168-5.
7
Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation.使用关怀和支持计划为虚弱人群实施常规跌倒预防和管理:定性评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 11;17(10):e0275974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275974. eCollection 2022.
8
Health complexity assessment in primary care: A validity and feasibility study of the INTERMED tool.基层医疗中的健康复杂性评估:INTERMED 工具的有效性和可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263702. eCollection 2022.
9
Patient needs four years after first psychiatric hospitalization in a Brazilian cohort.患者在巴西队列中首次精神科住院四年后需要。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Jul 23;54(8):e11447. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e11447. eCollection 2021.
10
The Patient Activation through Community Empowerment/Engagement for Diabetes Management (PACE-D) protocol: a non-randomised controlled trial of personalised care and support planning for persons living with diabetes.《通过社区赋权/参与实现糖尿病管理的患者激活(PACE-D)方案:对糖尿病患者进行个性化护理和支持计划的非随机对照试验》
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01173-2.
The expert medical generalist.
医学通才专家。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68(675):495-496. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699329.
4
Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review.照护计划:在何种情况下对谁有效?一项快速的现实主义综述。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(14):2250-2266. doi: 10.1177/1049732318768807. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
5
"The more you know, the more you realise it is really challenging to do": Tensions and uncertainties in person-centred support for people with long-term conditions.“你知道的越多,就越会意识到,要做到以人为本的支持长期病患者真的很具挑战性”:以人为本的长期病患者支持中的紧张和不确定性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1460-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Improving together: a new quality framework for GP clusters in Scotland.共同进步:苏格兰全科医生集群的新质量框架
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):294-295. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691601.
7
Why Health and Social Care Support for People with Long-Term Conditions Should be Oriented Towards Enabling Them to Live Well.为何针对慢性病患者的健康与社会护理支持应旨在帮助他们过上美好生活。
Health Care Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):48-65. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0335-1.
8
We need to talk about purpose: a critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals' approaches to self-management support for people with long-term conditions.我们需要探讨目的:对健康与社会护理专业人员为长期疾病患者提供自我管理支持的方法进行批判性诠释性综合分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/hex.12453. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
General Practitioners' Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation.全科医生的同理心与健康结果:高贫困和低贫困地区就诊的前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):117-24. doi: 10.1370/afm.1910.
10
Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice.患者反馈助力全科医疗质量提升。
BMJ. 2016 Feb 18;352:i913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i913.