Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
An-Najah BioSciences Unit, Centre for Poisons Control, Chemical and Biological Analyses, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0928-3.
Electronic health records (EHRs) with embedded clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to improve healthcare delivery. This study was conducted to explore merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when planning for, designing, developing, implementing, piloting, evaluating, maintaining, upgrading, and/or using EHRs with CDSSs.
A mixed-method combining the Delphi technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process was used. Potentially important items were collected after a thorough search of the literature and from interviews with key contact experts (n = 19). Opinions and views of the 76 panelists on the use of EHRs were also explored. Iterative Delphi rounds were conducted to achieve consensus on 122 potentially important items by a panel of 76 participants. Items on which consensus was achieved were ranked in the order of their importance using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Of the 122 potentially important items presented to the panelists in the Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved on 110 (90.2%) items. Of these, 16 (14.5%) items were related to the demographic characteristics of the patient, 16 (14.5%) were related to prescribing medications, 16 (14.5%) were related to checking prescriptions and alerts, 14 (12.7%) items were related to the patient's identity, 13 (11.8%) items were related to patient assessment, 12 (10.9%) items were related to the quality of alerts, 11 (10%) items were related to admission and discharge of the patient, 9 (8.2%) items were general features, and 3 (2.7%) items were related to diseases and making diagnosis.
In this study, merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when planning for, designing, developing, implementing, piloting, evaluating, maintaining, upgrading, and/or using EHRs with CDSSs were explored. Considering items on which consensus was achieved might promote congruence and safe use of EHRs. Further studies are still needed to determine if these recommendations can improve patient safety and outcomes in Palestinian hospitals.
嵌入临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的电子健康记录(EHR)有可能改善医疗保健的提供。本研究旨在探讨在规划、设计、开发、实施、试点、评估、维护、升级和/或使用 EHR 与 CDSS 时需要考虑的优点、功能和需求。
采用混合方法,结合德尔菲技术和层次分析法。通过对文献的全面搜索和对关键联络专家的访谈(n=19)收集了潜在的重要项目。还探讨了 76 名小组成员对使用 EHR 的意见和看法。通过一个由 76 名参与者组成的小组进行了迭代德尔菲回合,就 122 个潜在的重要项目达成了共识。使用层次分析法对达成共识的项目进行了重要性排序。
在德尔菲回合中向小组成员展示的 122 个潜在重要项目中,有 110 个(90.2%)项目达成了共识。其中,16 项(14.5%)与患者的人口统计学特征有关,16 项(14.5%)与开处方药物有关,16 项(14.5%)与检查处方和警报有关,14 项(12.7%)与患者身份有关,13 项(11.8%)与患者评估有关,12 项(10.9%)与警报质量有关,11 项(10%)与患者入院和出院有关,9 项(8.2%)为一般特征,3 项(2.7%)与疾病和诊断有关。
本研究探讨了在规划、设计、开发、实施、试点、评估、维护、升级和/或使用 EHR 与 CDSS 时需要考虑的优点、功能和需求。考虑达成共识的项目可能会促进 EHR 的一致性和安全使用。仍需要进一步研究以确定这些建议是否可以提高巴勒斯坦医院的患者安全性和结果。