Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建中股四头肌与腘绳肌自体移植物的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Quadriceps versus hamstrings autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized control trial.

作者信息

Yadav Arvind Kumar, Sharma Ajay, Paul Nirvin, Bhakhar Anurag, Sarkar Bhaskar, Azam Md Quamar

机构信息

Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences, Gajraula, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, Graphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Sep 13;35(1):395. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04510-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is on the rise owing to its specific attributes, such as predictable size, lower graft failure rate, and less donor site morbidity. The hypothesis for the current study is that ACL reconstruction using QT autograft results in better clinical outcomes than hamstrings tendon (HT).

METHODS

Patients underwent a single-bundle, all-inside ACL reconstruction after being randomized into QT and HT groups. At 12 months, objective outcomes (Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side anterior translation measurement with KT-1000) and subjective outcomes (Lysholm and KOOS scores) were evaluated, along with donor site morbidity and graft failure.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (QT: 33, HT: 36) were included in the final analysis. At 12 month follow-up, a negative Lachman test was found in 72.7% of cases in the QT group and 41.6% in the HT group (p = 0.04). Positive pivot shift was more frequent in the HT group (13.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.27), while KT-1000 showed greater anterior translation in the HT group than QT (3.77 ± 2.01 vs. 2.73 ± 1.64 mm, p = 0.23). Lysholm (92.4 vs. 88.2, p = 0.008) and KOOS (94.1 vs. 89.6, p = 0.01) scores were higher in the QT group. The only case of graft failure occurred in the HT group, which also had more sensory hypoesthesia (30.5%), while one patient in the QT group developed stiffness requiring arthrolysis.

CONCLUSION

Quadriceps tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction offers superior translational stability and reduced donor site morbidity, with comparable PROMs and a trend toward improved rotational stability.

CTRI REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2023/07/055894.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

Level 1, Randomized Controlled Study.

摘要

目的

由于股四头肌肌腱(QT)自体移植物具有可预测的尺寸、较低的移植物失败率和较少的供区并发症等特定属性,其使用正在增加。本研究的假设是,使用QT自体移植物进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建比使用腘绳肌腱(HT)能带来更好的临床结果。

方法

患者被随机分为QT组和HT组,之后接受单束全内置ACL重建。在12个月时,评估客观结果(Lachman试验、前抽屉试验、轴移试验以及使用KT-1000进行的左右侧前向平移测量)和主观结果(Lysholm和KOOS评分),同时评估供区并发症和移植物失败情况。

结果

最终分析纳入了69例患者(QT组:33例,HT组:36例)。在12个月随访时,QT组72.7%的病例Lachman试验为阴性,HT组为41.6%(p = 0. —— 此处原文有误,应为p = 0.04)。HT组阳性轴移更常见(13.9%对0%,p = 0.27),而KT-1000显示HT组的前向平移大于QT组(3.77±2.01对2.73±1.64毫米,p = 0.23)。QT组的Lysholm评分(92.4对88.2,p = 0.008)和KOOS评分(94.1对89.6,p = 0.01)更高。唯一的移植物失败病例发生在HT组,该组感觉减退也更多(30.5%),而QT组有1例患者出现需要关节松解术的僵硬。

结论

在ACL重建中,股四头肌肌腱自体移植物提供了更好的平移稳定性并降低了供区并发症,患者报告结局测量(PROMs)相当,且有旋转稳定性改善的趋势。

临床试验注册编号

CTRI/2023/07/055894。

证据水平

1级,随机对照研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验