• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种骨龄评估方法在沙特阿拉伯儿童中的适用性。

Applicability of two bone age assessment methods to children from Saudi Arabia.

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):156.e1-156.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.029
PMID:31706569
Abstract

AIM

To assess the applicability of the Greulich & Pyle (G&P) and Tanner & Whitehouse (TW3) methods to children from Saudi Arabia using both subjective (manual) rating and BoneXpert software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bone age (BA) was assessed using the G&P and TW3 methods, firstly by independent manual rating of two observers, followed by a single observer using the BoneXpert software program. In total, 420 hand trauma radiographs for Saudi Arabians (220 males, 329 left, age range 1-18 years) performed in the period January 2012 to September 2016 were assessed. Paired sample t test was used to compare the difference between mean BA and mean chronological age (CA) and to compare the difference between manual and BoneXpert ratings. Statistical analysis was undertaken using SPSS v.25.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between BA and CA in males when using the G&P (mean difference -0.36±1 years, p<0.01) and TW3 (mean difference -0.22±0.9 years, p=0.03) methods, but not in females for either G&P (mean difference 0.13±1.2 years) or TW3 (mean difference 0.08±1.1 years). In males, BoneXpert results conformed to the manual ratings for TW3, but not for G&P, for which the mean difference between manual and BoneXpert ratings was -0.27±0.5 years (p<0.01).

DISCUSSION

The present results indicate that manual and BoneXpert-derived G&P and TW3 bone age assessment can be applied with no modification to Saudi Arabian females; however, only TW3 BoneXpert-derived BA can be applied without caution to Saudi Arabian males.

摘要

目的

使用主观(手动)评分和 BoneXpert 软件评估沙特阿拉伯儿童的 Greulich & Pyle(G&P)和 Tanner & Whitehouse(TW3)方法的适用性。

材料和方法

使用 G&P 和 TW3 方法评估骨龄(BA),首先由两名观察者进行独立的手动评分,然后由一名观察者使用 BoneXpert 软件程序进行评分。总共评估了 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间在沙特阿拉伯进行的 420 例手部创伤 X 光片(220 名男性,329 名左手,年龄范围为 1-18 岁)。采用配对样本 t 检验比较 BA 与实际年龄(CA)的平均值之间的差异,并比较手动评分和 BoneXpert 评分之间的差异。使用 SPSS v.25 进行统计分析。

结果

使用 G&P(平均差值-0.36±1 岁,p<0.01)和 TW3(平均差值-0.22±0.9 岁,p=0.03)方法时,男性的 BA 与 CA 之间存在统计学显著差异,但女性的 G&P(平均差值 0.13±1.2 岁)或 TW3(平均差值 0.08±1.1 岁)均无差异。在男性中,BoneXpert 结果与 TW3 的手动评分相符,但与 G&P 不符,手动评分和 BoneXpert 评分之间的平均差值为-0.27±0.5 岁(p<0.01)。

讨论

本研究结果表明,无需修改即可将手动和 BoneXpert 衍生的 G&P 和 TW3 骨龄评估应用于沙特阿拉伯女性;然而,只有 TW3 BoneXpert 衍生的 BA 可以在没有谨慎的情况下应用于沙特阿拉伯男性。

相似文献

1
Applicability of two bone age assessment methods to children from Saudi Arabia.两种骨龄评估方法在沙特阿拉伯儿童中的适用性。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):156.e1-156.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
2
Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children.两种常用骨龄评估方法在 21 世纪英国儿童中的适用性。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):504-513. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06300-x. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Development of a simplified new method of bone age estimation using three bones of the hand and wrist.发展一种使用手部和腕部的 3 块骨头来简化骨龄评估的新方法。
Endocrine. 2024 Jun;84(3):1135-1145. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03684-9. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
4
Automatic Determination of the Greulich-Pyle Bone Age as an Alternative Approach for Chinese Children with Discordant Bone Age.自动确定格-派骨龄作为中国骨龄不一致儿童的替代方法。
Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;86(2):83-89. doi: 10.1159/000446434. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
A comprehensive validation study of the latest version of BoneXpert on a large cohort of Caucasian children and adolescents.对最新版本的 BoneXpert 在一大群白种人儿童和青少年中的全面验证研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 24;14:1130580. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1130580. eCollection 2023.
6
A comparison of bone age assessments using automated and manual methods in children of Indian ethnicity.印度裔儿童中使用自动和手动方法进行骨龄评估的比较。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Oct;52(11):2188-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05516-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Automatic assessment of bone age in Taiwanese children: A comparison of the Greulich and Pyle method and the Tanner and Whitehouse 3 method.台湾地区儿童骨龄的自动评估:Greulich 和 Pyle 法与 Tanner 和 Whitehouse 3 法的比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;36(11):937-943. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12268. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Bone age assessment: Large-scale comparison of Greulich-Pyle method and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 method for Taiwanese children.骨龄评估:台湾儿童格鲁利希-派尔法与坦纳-怀特豪斯3法的大规模比较
J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 Feb 1;86(2):246-253. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000854. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
[Correlation in radiological bone age determination using the Greulich and Pyle method versus automated evaluation using BoneXpert software].[使用格鲁利希和派尔方法进行放射学骨龄测定与使用BoneXpert软件进行自动评估之间的相关性]
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2018 Oct;89(5):606-611. doi: 10.4067/S0370-41062018005000705.
10
Maturation Disparity between Hand-Wrist Bones in a Chinese Sample of Normal Children: An Analysis Based on Automatic BoneXpert and Manual Greulich and Pyle Atlas Assessment.中国正常儿童样本中手-腕骨成熟度差异:基于自动骨龄仪和手动格雷利希和派尔图谱评估的分析
Korean J Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):435-42. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.435. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of bone age assessment using manual Greulich and Pyle method versus automated BoneXpert method in South African children.南非儿童中使用手动格-派方法与自动BoneXpert方法进行骨龄评估的比较。
SA J Radiol. 2025 Apr 11;29(1):3033. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3033. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of HIV infection on skeletal maturity in peripubertal children in Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study.津巴布韦青春期前儿童中 HIV 感染对骨骼成熟度的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04965-y.
3
Precision and Accuracy of Radiological Bone Age Assessment in Children among Different Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.
不同种族儿童放射学骨龄评估的准确性和精确性:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;13(19):3124. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193124.
4
Deep learning accurately classifies elbow joint effusion in adult and pediatric radiographs.深度学习能准确地对成人和儿童 X 光片中的肘关节积液进行分类。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 12;12(1):11803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16154-x.
5
Autonomous artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology: the use and perception of BoneXpert for bone age assessment.儿科放射学中的自主人工智能:BoneXpert 用于骨龄评估的使用和感知。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Jun;52(7):1338-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05295-w. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric musculoskeletal radiology.当前和新兴的人工智能在儿科肌肉骨骼放射学中的应用。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Oct;52(11):2149-2158. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05130-8. Epub 2021 Jul 16.