• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检查出院地点和费用的 30 天再入院风险评分方案。

Examination of a Proposed 30-day Readmission Risk Score on Discharge Location and Cost.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.

Department of Cardiac Surgery Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1797-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.048. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.048
PMID:31706877
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Readmissions cost an estimated $41 billion in the United States each year. To address this, a single institution recently developed a new risk model predictive of 30-day readmission after adult cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to validate and refine this new readmission risk model using a statewide database.

METHODS

A total of 19,964 patients were analyzed using a statewide Society of Thoracic Surgeons database (2014-2017). The aforementioned multivariate model was replicated (model 1): race, hospital length of stay, chronic lung disease, operation type, and renal failure. Model 2 also included discharge location. Thirty-day readmission risk scores and low-risk (0%-10%), moderate-risk (10%-13%), and high-risk (≥13%) categories were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall 30-day readmission rate was 11.1% with both models 1 and 2 predicting readmission (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.11 vs odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.11). Statistically significant differences were observed across all risk categories in discharge location and total cost. For models 1 and 2, 86% of low-risk patients were discharged to home vs 66.9% and 42.9% of patients in high-risk groups, respectively (P < .001). The largest increases were observed with a hospice discharge location for both model 1 (from $37,930 to $89,285) and model 2 (from $37,930 to $89,230).

CONCLUSIONS

Both risk models significantly predicted 30-day readmission in our multiinstitutional dataset, confirming the score is valid and a generalizable quality improvement tool. The addition of discharge location and total cost adds valuable information of the ongoing efforts to identify patients at high risk for readmission.

摘要

背景

据估计,美国每年的再入院费用约为 410 亿美元。为了解决这个问题,一家机构最近开发了一种新的风险模型,可以预测成人心脏手术后 30 天内的再入院率。本研究的目的是使用全州范围的数据库验证和改进这种新的再入院风险模型。

方法

使用全州范围的胸外科医生协会数据库(2014-2017 年)对 19964 例患者进行了分析。复制了上述多变量模型(模型 1):种族、住院时间、慢性肺部疾病、手术类型和肾衰竭。模型 2 还包括出院地点。计算了 30 天再入院风险评分和低风险(0%-10%)、中风险(10%-13%)和高风险(≥13%)类别。

结果

两个模型(1 和 2)均预测再入院,总再入院率为 11.1%(优势比,1.09;95%置信区间,1.08-1.11 与优势比,1.10;95%置信区间,1.08-1.11)。在出院地点和总费用方面,所有风险类别均存在统计学显著差异。对于模型 1 和 2,86%的低风险患者出院回家,而高风险组分别有 66.9%和 42.9%的患者出院(P<.001)。对于模型 1(从 37930 美元增加到 89285 美元)和模型 2(从 37930 美元增加到 89230 美元),观察到最大的增加是与临终关怀出院地点相关。

结论

这两个风险模型在我们的多机构数据集都显著预测了 30 天再入院,证实了该评分是有效的,是一种可推广的质量改进工具。添加出院地点和总费用为识别再入院高风险患者的持续努力提供了有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
Examination of a Proposed 30-day Readmission Risk Score on Discharge Location and Cost.检查出院地点和费用的 30 天再入院风险评分方案。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1797-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.048. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Women undergoing aortic surgery are at higher risk for unplanned readmissions compared with men especially when discharged home.与男性相比,接受主动脉手术的女性再次入院的风险更高,尤其是在出院回家时。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1496-1504.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.054. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Thirty-Day Readmission After Infective Endocarditis: Analysis From a Nationwide Readmission Database.感染性心内膜炎 30 天后再入院:来自全国再入院数据库的分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011598. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011598.
4
Association Between Weekend Discharge and Hospital Readmission Rates Following Major Surgery.术后主要治疗后周末出院与医院再入院率之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):849-56. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1087.
5
Analysis of Hospital Readmissions After Prosthetic Urologic Surgery in the United States: Nationally Representative Estimates of Causes, Costs, and Predictive Factors.美国泌尿外科假体手术后再入院情况分析:病因、成本及预测因素的全国代表性估计
J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):1059-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
7
Hospital Practice of Direct-Home Discharge and 30-Day Readmission After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/ACC TVT) Registry.经胸主动脉瓣置换术协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗(STS/ACC TVT)注册中心的直接出院和 30 天内再入院的医院实践。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 21;6(8):e006127. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006127.
8
Comparison of Rates and Outcomes of Readmission to Index vs Nonindex Hospitals After Major Cancer Surgery.主要癌症手术后,从索引医院与非索引医院再次入院的比率和结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):719-727. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0380.
9
Thirty-day readmissions after cardiac implantable electronic devices in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.美国心脏植入式电子设备 30 天再入院率:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):708-715. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
10
Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的30天再入院率及危险因素比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1432-1444.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.097. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction models for hospital readmissions in patients with heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测心脏病患者住院再入院的模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e047576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047576.