College of Applied Behavior Science, University of Indianapolis, 1400 E Hanna Ave, Indianapolis, IN, 46227, USA.
Sociology and Anthropology, Missouri State University, 901S. National Ave, Springfield, MO, 65897, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Apr;49(4):936-950. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01158-0. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
During adolescence, individuals make judgements on the legitimacy of authorities to make and enforce rules and they differentiate between various types of rules. This study tracked a socially and racially diverse sample (47% White) of 800 Brazilians for three years, ages 11-13 (50% female), allowing for variation between issues and individuals. The strongest predictors of compliance were adolescents' beliefs that parents were legitimate authorities. Other significant predictors were authorities' procedural justice and disciplinary practices. Legitimacy attributions partially mediated the relationship between procedural justice and compliance. Compliance and legitimacy varied across issues. Across time, parenting variables diminished in predictive strength while legitimacy attributions increased. Procedural justice practices may partially establish parental legitimacy, while disciplinary practices are less effective and perhaps counter-productive.
在青春期，个体对制定和执行规则的权威的合法性做出判断，并对各种类型的规则进行区分。本研究对 800 名巴西人进行了为期三年的跟踪调查，这些人在社会和种族上存在差异（47%为白人），年龄在 11-13 岁之间（50%为女性），允许个体之间存在差异。最能预测遵守规则的因素是青少年认为父母是合法权威。其他重要的预测因素是权威的程序正义和纪律处分做法。合法性归因部分中介了程序正义与遵守之间的关系。遵守和合法性因问题而异。随着时间的推移，育儿变量的预测力减弱，而合法性归因则增加。程序正义实践可能部分建立了父母的合法性，而纪律处分做法的效果较差，甚至可能适得其反。
