Upfill-Brown Alexander, Satariano Nicholas, Feeley Brian
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
JSES Open Access. 2019 Sep 16;3(3):154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.07.008. eCollection 2019 Oct.
The number of anatomic total shoulder (TSA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSA) is rapidly increasing in the United States. Stemless shoulder arthroplasty has numerous theoretical advantages, including preserved bone stock, decreased operating time, reduced rate of intraoperative humerus fracture, and flexibility of anatomic reconstruction. Only recently studies with more than 5 years of mean follow-up have become available.
The MEDLINE database was systematically queried to identify all studies reporting outcomes regarding anatomic or reverse stemless shoulder arthroplasty. Studies were categorized according to mean reported follow-up. Outcome scores and range of motion measurements were compiled. Complication and revision rates due to failure of the humeral or glenoid components were summarized.
Nineteen TSA and HA studies with a total of 1115 patients were identified, with 4 studies and 162 patients with a mean follow-up between 60 and 120 months. Six RTSA studies with a total of 346 patients were identified, all with a mean follow-up between 18 and 60 months. There was a reliable improvement in outcomes compared with preoperative scores across studies. A cumulative 0.7% (8 of 1115) humeral component complication rate was found for TSA and HA components. There was a cumulative 1.7% (6 of 346) humeral complication rate for RTSA prostheses.
In the studies reporting similar outcome measures, there were reliable improvements on par with stemmed counterparts. Aggregate complication rates appear similar to those published in the literature for stemmed components. Evidence supporting the utility and safety of stemless designs would be strengthened by longer-term follow-up and additional prospective comparative studies.
在美国,解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)、半关节置换术(HA)和反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的数量正在迅速增加。无柄肩关节置换术有许多理论优势,包括保留骨量、缩短手术时间、降低术中肱骨骨折发生率以及解剖重建的灵活性。直到最近才有平均随访超过5年的研究。
系统检索MEDLINE数据库,以识别所有报告解剖型或反式无柄肩关节置换术结果的研究。根据报告的平均随访时间对研究进行分类。汇总结果评分和活动度测量值。总结了由于肱骨或肩胛盂组件失败导致的并发症和翻修率。
确定了19项关于TSA和HA的研究,共1115例患者,其中4项研究和162例患者的平均随访时间为60至120个月。确定了6项关于RTSA的研究,共346例患者,所有研究的平均随访时间为18至60个月。与术前评分相比,各项研究的结果均有可靠改善。TSA和HA组件的肱骨组件并发症累积发生率为0.7%(1115例中的8例)。RTSA假体的肱骨并发症累积发生率为1.7%(346例中的6例)。
在报告相似结果测量指标的研究中,与有柄同类产品相比有可靠的改善。总体并发症发生率似乎与文献中报道的有柄组件相似。长期随访和更多前瞻性比较研究将加强支持无柄设计实用性和安全性的证据。