• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对心脏再同步治疗伴或不伴除颤后生存率和心力衰竭住院率的影响。

Sex-Specific Differences in Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation.

机构信息

Aston Medical Research Institute Aston Medical School Aston University Birmingham United Kingdom.

Quality and Outcomes Research Unit Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013485. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013485. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.013485
PMID:31718445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6915284/
Abstract

Background Women are underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials. Some studies suggest that women fare better than men after CRT. We sought to explore clinical outcomes in women and men undergoing CRT-defibrillation or CRT-pacing in real-world clinical practice. Methods and Results A national database (Hospital Episode Statistics for England) was used to quantify clinical outcomes in 43 730 patients (women: 10 890 [24.9%]; men: 32 840 [75.1%]) undergoing CRT over 7.6 years, (median follow-up 2.2 years, interquartile range, 1-4 years). In analysis of the total population, the primary end point of total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76) and the secondary end point of total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR, 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.82) were lower in women, independent of known confounders. Total mortality (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.76) and total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.82) were lower for CRT-defibrillation than for CRT-pacing. In analyses of patients with (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.98) or without (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.73) a myocardial infarction, women had a lower total mortality. In sex-specific analyses, total mortality was lower after CRT-defibrillation in women (aHR, 0.83; =0.013) and men (aHR, 0.69; <0.001). Conclusions Compared with men, women lived longer and were less likely to be hospitalized for heart failure after CRT. In both sexes, CRT-defibrillation was superior to CRT-pacing with respect to survival and heart failure hospitalization. The longest survival after CRT was observed in women without a history of myocardial infarction.

摘要

背景

女性在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)试验中的代表性不足。一些研究表明,女性在 CRT 后表现优于男性。我们旨在探讨真实世界临床实践中接受 CRT 除颤或 CRT 起搏的女性和男性的临床结局。

方法

利用英国医院入院统计数据库(Hospital Episode Statistics for England),在 7.6 年内对 43730 例接受 CRT 的患者(女性:10890[24.9%];男性:32840[75.1%])进行了临床结局量化分析(中位随访时间为 2.2 年,四分位间距 1-4 年)。在对总人群的分析中,女性的主要终点(全因死亡率)(调整后的危险比[aHR],0.73;95%置信区间[CI],0.69-0.76)和次要终点(全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院)(aHR,0.79,95%CI 0.75-0.82)均较低,独立于已知混杂因素。女性的全因死亡率(aHR,0.73;95%CI,0.70-0.76)和全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院率(aHR,0.79;95%CI,0.75-0.82)均低于 CRT 除颤组。在分析伴有(aHR,0.89;95%CI,0.80-0.98)或不伴(aHR,0.70;95%CI,0.66-0.73)心肌梗死的患者时,女性的全因死亡率较低。在按性别分层的分析中,女性 CRT 除颤组(aHR,0.83;=0.013)和男性 CRT 除颤组(aHR,0.69;<0.001)的全因死亡率均较低。

结论

与男性相比,女性在 CRT 后寿命更长,心力衰竭住院率更低。在男性和女性中,CRT 除颤在生存率和心力衰竭住院率方面均优于 CRT 起搏。在没有心肌梗死病史的女性中,CRT 后生存时间最长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/85ba6305544f/JAH3-8-e013485-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/118a5ca4e94a/JAH3-8-e013485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/4667ae4e5d70/JAH3-8-e013485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/b69add9c1151/JAH3-8-e013485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/b8dcbe145fe1/JAH3-8-e013485-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/85ba6305544f/JAH3-8-e013485-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/118a5ca4e94a/JAH3-8-e013485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/4667ae4e5d70/JAH3-8-e013485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/b69add9c1151/JAH3-8-e013485-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/b8dcbe145fe1/JAH3-8-e013485-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/460d/6915284/85ba6305544f/JAH3-8-e013485-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-Specific Differences in Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation.性别对心脏再同步治疗伴或不伴除颤后生存率和心力衰竭住院率的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013485. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013485. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
2
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.采用四极与非四极左心室导线行心脏再同步治疗:单部位左心室起搏时程控双心室起搏对生存率和心力衰竭住院的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 17;6(10):e007026. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007026.
3
Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.非缺血性心肌病患者心脏再同步治疗联合或不联合除颤的疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 5;70(10):1216-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.712.
4
Renal function and the long-term clinical outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillation.肾功能与有或无除颤功能的心脏再同步治疗的长期临床结局
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;42(6):595-602. doi: 10.1111/pace.13659. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillation: impact of the aetiology of cardiomyopathy.心脏再同步治疗伴或不伴除颤的长期临床结局:心肌病病因的影响。
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):1804-1812. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux357.
6
Survival in Women Versus Men Following Implantation of Pacemakers, Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in a Large, Nationwide Cohort.在一个大型全国队列中,植入起搏器、除颤器和心脏再同步治疗设备后女性与男性的生存率比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 10;6(5):e005031. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005031.
7
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
8
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Use and Outcomes of Dual Chamber or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Among Older Patients Requiring Ventricular Pacing in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.在国家心血管数据注册植入式心脏复律除颤器登记处中,需要心室起搏的老年患者使用双腔或心脏再同步治疗除颤器的情况和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35470.
10
Cardiac Resynchronization in Women: A Substudy of the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial.女性心脏再同步治疗:心力衰竭患者门诊心脏再同步除颤治疗试验的亚组研究
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;5(9):1036-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating an alert-based multiparametric algorithm for predicting heart failure hospitalisations in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a meta-cohort study.评估一种基于警报的多参数算法在预测植入式心脏复律除颤器患者心力衰竭住院情况中的应用:一项荟萃队列研究。
Open Heart. 2025 Jul 8;12(2):e003474. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003474.
2
Sex-related differences in heart failure patients: physiological mechanisms of cardiovascular ageing and evidence-based sex-specific medical therapies.心力衰竭患者的性别差异:心血管衰老的生理机制及循证医学支持的性别特异性治疗方法
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17539447241309673. doi: 10.1177/17539447241309673.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in survival after a diagnosis of heart failure in the United Kingdom 2000-2017: population based cohort study.2000-2017 年英国心力衰竭诊断后生存率趋势:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 13;364:l223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l223.
2
Gender-Based Differences in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response.心脏再同步治疗反应中的性别差异。
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2019 Mar;11(1):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2018.11.015.
3
The impact of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on cardiac structure and function: Insights from the UK Biobank imaging enhancement study.
Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists Position Paper 'Gender discrepancy: time to implement gender-based clinical management'.
意大利医院心脏病专家协会立场文件《性别差异:是时候实施基于性别的临床管理了》
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 May 16;26(Suppl 2):ii264-ii293. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae034. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病中的性别差异。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Mar 14;20(2):107-119. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1328. eCollection 2024.
5
A disease of her own? Unique features of heart failure in women.自身的疾病?女性心力衰竭的独特特征。
Climacteric. 2024 Feb;27(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2023.2256673. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
6
A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiac resynchronisation therapy with or without defibrillator based on health claims data.基于健康声明数据的心脏再同步治疗(无论是否配备除颤器)的长期成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Sep 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00384-x.
7
Survival of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator: the RESET-CRT project.接受心脏再同步治疗(有或无除颤器)患者的生存情况:RESET-CRT 项目。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jul 14;43(27):2591-2599. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac053.
绝经激素治疗(MHT)对心脏结构和功能的影响:来自英国生物库成像增强研究的新见解。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 8;13(3):e0194015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194015. eCollection 2018.
4
Sex-specific outcomes with addition of defibrillation to resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者在心脏再同步治疗中加用除颤器的性别特异性结局。
Heart. 2017 May;103(10):753-760. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310677. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.女性与男性的心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据登记处的观察性比较疗效研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2 Suppl 1):S4-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001548. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Women with nonischemic cardiomyopathy have a favorable prognosis and a better left ventricular remodeling than men after cardiac resynchronization therapy.非缺血性心肌病女性患者在心脏再同步治疗后比男性有更好的预后和左心室重塑。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Apr;17(4):291-8. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000187.
7
Gender, underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block in heart failure.性别、心脏再同步治疗的未充分利用以及心力衰竭中QRS波增宽和左束支传导阻滞的预后影响
Europace. 2015 Mar;17(3):424-31. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu205. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
More favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in women than in men.女性对心脏再同步治疗的反应优于男性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;7(5):807-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001786. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
9
Left bundle branch block predicts better survival in women than men receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term follow-up of ∼ 145,000 patients.左束支传导阻滞预测女性心脏再同步治疗患者的生存率优于男性:约 145000 例患者的长期随访。
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Jun;1(3):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in recently postmenopausal women: randomised trial.激素替代疗法对近期绝经后妇女心血管事件的影响:随机试验。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 9;345:e6409. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6409.