Suppr超能文献

基于资源的相对价值量表中的评估与管理服务。

Evaluation and management services in the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

作者信息

Braun P, Hsiao W C, Becker E R, DeNicola M

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

JAMA. 1988 Oct 28;260(16):2409-17.

PMID:3172410
Abstract

Evaluation and management (E/M) services, which include making diagnoses, counseling and educating, developing strategies of care, and following up on treatment, are common to all medical specialties. Surveys of a variety of specialists using the magnitude-estimation method show that physicians agree closely in rating the work of particular E/M services. Regardless of the type of E/M service, the site at which it is performed, or the specialty performing it, work per unit of time varies only slightly. Comparison of work and time for services to which experts assigned billing codes in our consultative process indicates, however, that there may be large differences in the way different specialties use these billing codes. In some instances, work entailed by some of the E/M billing codes within specialties also appears to vary substantially. If empirical studies of physicians' coding and billing practices support our findings, possible responses might include (1) developing specialty-specific resource-based relative values for E/M services and (2) redefining the Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology, edition 4, codes for these services in terms that include time specifications.

摘要

评估与管理(E/M)服务包括进行诊断、咨询与教育、制定护理策略以及跟踪治疗情况,这些服务在所有医学专科中都很常见。使用量值估计法对各类专科医生进行的调查表明,医生们在对特定E/M服务的工作进行评级时意见高度一致。无论E/M服务的类型、执行地点或执行专科如何,单位时间内的工作量变化都很小。然而,在我们的咨询过程中,将计费代码分配给服务的专家对工作与时间的比较表明,不同专科使用这些计费代码的方式可能存在很大差异。在某些情况下,专科内一些E/M计费代码所涉及的工作似乎也有很大差异。如果对医生编码和计费做法的实证研究支持我们的发现,可能的应对措施包括:(1)为E/M服务制定基于专科资源的相对价值;(2)根据包括时间规格在内的术语重新定义《医师现行操作术语》第4版中这些服务的代码。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验