Becker E R, Dunn D, Braun P, Hsiao W C
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):799-803. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.799.
The Harvard resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) for physician services has assumed a critical role in physician payment reform. We have demonstrated that the relative resource costs of providing physician services can be defined and measured in a rational and systematic way and that the results are reliable and valid. Consequently, the RBRVS is a viable basis for national payment policy and could be used for establishing a national fee schedule for physician services or to identify "mispriced" physician procedures. Since the release of the final report of the first phase of the Harvard RBRVS study in September of 1988, there has been extensive review, discussion, and criticism of the RBRVS. Dr. Laurence F. McMahon, Jr., in the accompanying article, provides a further critique of our research. In this paper, we review the RBRVS study and results and respond to the major criticisms that have been raised by Dr. McMahon and others. We then describe the tasks we are currently undertaking to expand and validate our research and address the important criticisms and limitations.
哈佛医生服务资源基础相对价值尺度(RBRVS)在医生薪酬改革中发挥了关键作用。我们已经证明,提供医生服务的相对资源成本能够以合理且系统的方式进行界定和衡量,而且结果是可靠且有效的。因此,RBRVS是国家支付政策的可行基础,可用于制定国家医生服务收费表或识别“定价错误”的医生诊疗项目。自1988年9月哈佛RBRVS研究第一阶段的最终报告发布以来,人们对RBRVS进行了广泛的审视、讨论和批评。小劳伦斯·F·麦克马洪博士在随附文章中对我们的研究提出了进一步批评。在本文中,我们回顾了RBRVS研究及结果,并回应了麦克马洪博士及其他人提出的主要批评。然后,我们描述了目前为扩展和验证我们的研究以及应对重要批评和局限性而正在开展的任务。