Becker E R, Dunn D, Hsiao W C
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
JAMA. 1988 Oct 28;260(16):2397-402.
Practice costs, defined as those costs of medical practice that exclude the physician's own time and effort, represent a substantial portion of the resources necessary to perform a service. In this article we describe the development of the practice cost index used in constructing the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS). We derived the practice cost index value for each specialty, using specialty-specific practice costs and gross revenue data. The index values for all other specialties are standardized to the value for general surgery, and these are used to adjust the resource-based relative values for services performed by each specialty; in this way, the RBRVS incorporates practice cost variations. The data used in the construction of the practice cost index are the 1983 Physician Practice Cost and Income Survey data, adjusted to reflect the relative levels of 1986 professional liability insurance. Our findings show that among most specialties, the range of relative difference in practice costs as a percentage of gross revenue is approximately 15%. Four specialties fall outside this range: pathology, psychiatry, rheumatology, and orthopedic surgery. We discuss problems with the available data on practice costs as these relate to their use in the RBRVS and conceptual issues in applying practice costs to the construction of the RBRVS.
执业成本被定义为医疗执业中排除医生自身时间和精力之外的成本,它占提供一项服务所需资源的很大一部分。在本文中,我们描述了用于构建基于资源的相对价值尺度(RBRVS)的执业成本指数的发展情况。我们利用特定专科的执业成本和总收入数据得出了每个专科的执业成本指数值。所有其他专科的指数值都以普通外科的值为标准进行了标准化处理,并用于调整每个专科所提供服务的基于资源的相对价值;通过这种方式,RBRVS纳入了执业成本的差异。构建执业成本指数所使用的数据是1983年医生执业成本与收入调查数据,并根据1986年职业责任保险的相对水平进行了调整。我们的研究结果表明,在大多数专科中,执业成本占总收入百分比的相对差异范围约为15%。有四个专科不在这个范围内:病理学、精神病学、风湿病学和整形外科。我们讨论了与执业成本现有数据相关的问题,这些问题涉及它们在RBRVS中的使用以及将执业成本应用于RBRVS构建中的概念性问题。