Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fertil Steril. 2020 Jan;113(1):131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
To investigate whether endometrial thickness (EMT) influences the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic tertiary-care medical center.
PATIENT(S): A total of 16,556 patients were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2017, comprising 16,701 intrauterine, 488 ectopic, and 45 heterotopic pregnancy cycles after FET.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): EP was the primary outcome. EMT was the main measured variable. Data were analyzed with the binary logistic general estimating equations model to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for EP.
RESULT(S): After adjusting for confounders, EMT remained statistically significant as an independent risk factor for EP. Compared with women with an EMT of ≥14 mm, the aORs for women with EMT in the ranges 7-7.9, 8-9.9, and 10-11.9 mm were 2.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-4.40), 2.06 (95% CI, 1.33-3.20), and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.07-2.58), respectively. Hormone replacement treatment for endometrial preparation during FET increased the risk of EP after adjustment for confounding variables.
CONCLUSION(S): EMT is inversely proportional to EP rate in FET cycles and is therefore a potential quantitative marker of endometrial receptivity and uterine contractibility in an FET cycle. The predictive validity of EMT value must be evaluated in further studies.
探讨子宫内膜厚度(EMT)是否会影响冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期中异位妊娠(EP)的发生。
回顾性队列研究。
学术三级保健医疗中心。
2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月共纳入 16556 例患者,包括 FET 后 16701 例宫内妊娠、488 例异位妊娠和 45 例异位妊娠周期。
无。
EP 为主要结局。EMT 为主要测量变量。采用二项逻辑一般估计方程模型分析数据,计算 EP 的调整优势比(aOR)。
在调整混杂因素后,EMT 仍然是 EP 的独立危险因素。与 EMT≥14mm 的女性相比,EMT 在 7-7.9、8-9.9 和 10-11.9mm 范围内的女性 aOR 分别为 2.70(95%置信区间[CI],1.65-4.40)、2.06(95% CI,1.33-3.20)和 1.66(95% CI,1.07-2.58)。FET 期间子宫内膜准备的激素替代治疗在调整混杂变量后增加了 EP 的风险。
EMT 与 FET 周期中 EP 发生率呈反比,因此 EMT 是 FET 周期中子宫内膜容受性和子宫收缩性的潜在定量标志物。EMT 值的预测有效性必须在进一步的研究中进行评估。