Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Dec;74:101783. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101783. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
The current review presents a meta-analysis of the existing empirical literature on the prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals, as well as on correlates of NSSI within sexual and gender minority populations. Eligible publications (n = 51) were identified through a systematic search of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Embase, supplemented by a search of references of prior reviews on this topic. NSSI prevalence rates were quite elevated among sexual (29.68% lifetime) and gender (46.65% lifetime) minority individuals compared to heterosexual and/or cisgender peers (14.57% lifetime), with transgender (46.65% lifetime) and bisexual (41.47% lifetime) individuals being at greatest risk. Even among these group findings, sexual minority youth emerged as an especially vulnerable population. Moreover, current evidence suggests these rates and differences between LGBT and heterosexual and/or cisgender peers have not declined over time. These findings may in some measure be due to the existence of LGBT-specific risk correlates combined with general risk correlates being more severe among sexual and gender minority populations. Additional research, particularly employing a longitudinal design, is needed in this area to advance efforts to reduce risk for NSSI among sexual and gender minority individuals.
目前的综述对现有的关于女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)个体中非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)的流行率的实证文献进行了荟萃分析,以及对性少数群体和性别少数群体中 NSSI 的相关性进行了分析。通过对 PsycINFO、MEDLINE 和 Embase 的系统搜索,加上对该主题之前的综述参考文献的搜索,确定了符合条件的出版物(n=51)。与异性恋和/或顺性别同龄人(终身 14.57%)相比,性少数(终身 29.68%)和性别少数(终身 46.65%)个体的 NSSI 发生率相当高,其中跨性别(终身 46.65%)和双性恋(终身 41.47%)个体的风险最高。即使在这些群体发现中,性少数青年也成为一个特别脆弱的群体。此外,目前的证据表明,这些比率和 LGBT 与异性恋和/或顺性别同龄人之间的差异并没有随着时间的推移而减少。这些发现在某种程度上可能是由于存在 LGBT 特定的风险相关性,加上性少数群体中更严重的一般风险相关性所致。在这一领域需要进行更多的研究,特别是采用纵向设计,以努力减少性少数群体中 NSSI 的风险。