Millett C E, Perez-Rodriguez M, Shanahan M, Larsen E, Yamamoto H S, Bukowski C, Fichorova R, Burdick K E
Mood and Psychosis Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;26(8):4096-4105. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0591-1. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Data support the notion that 40-60% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) have neurocognitive deficits. It is increasingly accepted that functioning in BD is negatively impacted by these deficits, yet they have not been a successful target for treatment. The biomarkers that predict cognitive deficits in BD are largely unknown, however recent evidence suggests that inflammation may be associated with poorer cognitive outcomes in BD. We measured C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation and risk of inflammatory disease, in 222 euthymic BD patients and 52 healthy controls. Within the patient sample, using multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVA) we compared cognitive performance of those with high CRP (≥5 mg/L) versus the remaining subjects (<5 mg/L) on a battery of cognitive tests. We evaluated relationships with several other relevant clinical features. We also examined the role of CRP in cognitive decline using a proxy cognitive decline metric, defined as the difference between premorbid and current IQ estimates, in a logistic regression analysis. Approximately 80% of our sample were BD-I, and the remainder were BD-II and 42.6% of our sample had a history of psychosis. We found a statistically significant effect of CRP on cognitive performance on a broad range of tests; participants with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L had worse performance on several measures of executive functioning, MATRICS processing speed and MATRICS reasoning and problem solving relative to those with lower CRP. We also identified CRP as a significant positive predictor of proxy cognitive decline. Our results indicate that elevated CRP is associated with a broad cognitive dysfunction in affectively remitted BD patients. These results may point to a subgroup of patients who might benefit from treatments to reduce inflammation.
数据支持这样一种观点,即40%-60%的双相情感障碍(BD)患者存在神经认知缺陷。人们越来越认识到,这些缺陷会对BD患者的功能产生负面影响,但它们尚未成为成功的治疗靶点。虽然在BD中预测认知缺陷的生物标志物大多未知,但最近的证据表明,炎症可能与BD患者较差的认知结果相关。我们在222名心境正常的BD患者和52名健康对照者中测量了C反应蛋白(CRP),这是一种全身性炎症和炎症性疾病风险的标志物。在患者样本中,我们使用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA),在一系列认知测试中比较了高CRP(≥5mg/L)患者与其余受试者(<5mg/L)的认知表现。我们评估了与其他几个相关临床特征的关系。我们还在逻辑回归分析中,使用一种代理认知衰退指标(定义为病前和当前智商估计值之间的差异)来研究CRP在认知衰退中的作用。我们样本中约80%为BD-I型,其余为BD-II型,42.6%的样本有精神病病史。我们发现CRP对广泛测试中的认知表现有统计学上的显著影响;与CRP较低的参与者相比,CRP≥5mg/L的参与者在执行功能、MATRICS处理速度以及MATRICS推理和解决问题的多项测量中表现更差。我们还确定CRP是代理认知衰退的显著正预测因子。我们的结果表明,CRP升高与情感缓解的BD患者广泛的认知功能障碍有关。这些结果可能指向一类可能从减轻炎症的治疗中获益的患者亚组。