Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Research and Development of Next Generation Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jun;71(6):373-382. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12500. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Neurocognitive impairment is one of the core symptoms of bipolar disorder (BD). The MATRICS Cognitive Consensus Battery (MCCB) is a potential consensus assessment tool to evaluate cognitive function in patients with BD. Here, we report on cognitive deficits evaluated using the MCCB Japanese version (MCCB-J) in euthymic Japanese patients with BD, and compare them with scores in previous studies.
We compared neurocognitive function in 25 patients with euthymic BD and 53 healthy controls (HC). Additionally, we searched all available databases for studies that have evaluated cognitive function in BD using the MCCB, and conducted a meta-analysis.
Canonical discriminant analysis revealed significant differences in MCCB-J domain scores between BD and HC. Patients with BD performed significantly worse on visual learning, social cognition, speed of processing, and MCCB composite scores. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients with BD performed worse than HC, as reflected by MCCB composite scores and scores on all seven cognitive domains. However, there are differences in the cognitive deficits identified in previous studies compared with our participants, particularly social cognition.
As reported in previous studies, neurocognitive deficits were observed in Japanese euthymic BD patients assessed using the MCCB-J. Further study is needed to clarify whether differences in social cognition between this study and previous studies are a result of coping mechanisms for social settings in Japanese populations.
神经认知障碍是双相情感障碍(BD)的核心症状之一。MATRICS 认知共识成套测验(MCCB)是一种潜在的共识评估工具,可用于评估 BD 患者的认知功能。在这里,我们报告了使用 MCCB 日本版(MCCB-J)评估处于缓解期的日本 BD 患者的认知缺陷,并将其与以往研究的评分进行了比较。
我们比较了 25 名处于缓解期的 BD 患者和 53 名健康对照者(HC)的神经认知功能。此外,我们还搜索了所有可用的数据库,以评估使用 MCCB 评估 BD 认知功能的研究,并进行了荟萃分析。
典型判别分析显示,BD 和 HC 在 MCCB-J 域评分上存在显著差异。BD 患者在视觉学习、社会认知、处理速度和 MCCB 综合评分方面表现明显较差。我们的荟萃分析显示,BD 患者的 MCCB 综合评分和七个认知域的评分均较 HC 患者差。然而,与我们的参与者相比,以前的研究中确定的认知缺陷存在差异,特别是社会认知。
正如以前的研究报告的那样,使用 MCCB-J 评估的日本处于缓解期的 BD 患者存在神经认知障碍。需要进一步研究以阐明本研究与以前的研究之间社会认知的差异是否是由于日本人群对社会环境的应对机制造成的。