• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于团队的方法在坦桑尼亚引入和维持使用世卫组织手术安全检查表。

A Team-Based Approach to Introduce and Sustain the Use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Tanzania.

机构信息

Jhpiego Tanzania, Plot 72, Block 45B, Victoria, New Bagamoyo Road, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

Jhpiego, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):689-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05292-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05292-5
PMID:31741072
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Millions of patients worldwide suffer disability and death due to complications related to surgery. Many of these complications can be reduced by the use of the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), a simple tool that can enhance teamwork and communication and improve patient safety. Despite the evidence on benefits of its use, introducing and sustaining the use of the checklist are challenging. We present a team-based approach employed in a low-resource setting in Tanzania, which resulted in high checklist utilization and compliance rates.

METHODS

We reviewed reported data from facility registers supplemented by direct observation data by mentors to evaluate the use of the WHO SSC across 40 health facilities in two regions of Tanzania between January and December 2018. We analyzed the self-reported monthly data on total number of major surgeries performed and proportion of surgeries where the checklist was used. We also analyzed the use of the SSC during direct observation by external mentors and completion rates of the SSC in a random selection of patient files during two mentorship visits between June and December 2018.

RESULTS

During the review period, the average self-reported checklist utilization rate was 79.3% (11,564 out of 14,580 major surgeries). SSC utilization increased from 0% at baseline in January 2018 to 98% in December 2018. The proportion of checklists that were completely and correctly filled out increased between the two mentor visits from 82.1 to 92.8%, but the gain was significantly greater at health centers than at hospitals (p < 0.05). Health centers (which had one or two surgical teams) self-reported a higher checklist utilization rate than hospitals (which had multiple surgical teams), i.e., 99.4% vs 68.8% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Our findings suggest that Surgical Safety Checklist implementation is feasible even in lower-resource settings. The self-reported SSC utilization rate is higher than reported in other similar settings. We attribute this finding to the team-based approach employed and the ongoing regular mentorship. We recommend use of this approach to scale-up checklist use in other regions in the country as recommended in the Ministry of Health of Tanzania's National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP).

摘要

简介

全球数以百万计的患者因手术相关并发症而致残和死亡。许多这些并发症可以通过使用世界卫生组织(WHO)手术安全检查表(SSC)来减少,这是一种简单的工具,可以增强团队合作和沟通,并提高患者安全性。尽管有证据表明其使用有益,但引入和维持检查表的使用具有挑战性。我们介绍了在坦桑尼亚一个资源有限的环境中采用的基于团队的方法,该方法导致检查表的高利用率和高合规率。

方法

我们回顾了 2018 年 1 月至 12 月期间在坦桑尼亚两个地区的 40 家卫生机构报告的数据,并辅以导师的直接观察数据,评估了 WHO SSC 在这些机构中的使用情况。我们分析了自我报告的每月总例数和使用检查表的手术比例。我们还分析了外部导师在直接观察期间使用 SSC 的情况,以及在 2018 年 6 月至 12 月期间两次导师访问期间随机选择的患者档案中 SSC 的完成情况。

结果

在审查期间,自我报告的检查表利用率平均为 79.3%(14580 例主要手术中的 11564 例)。SSC 的利用率从 2018 年 1 月的 0%逐月增加,到 12 月达到 98%。两次导师访问之间,完全正确填写的检查表比例从 82.1%增加到 92.8%,但卫生中心的增长幅度明显大于医院(p<0.05)。只有一个或两个手术团队的卫生中心自我报告的检查表利用率高于拥有多个手术团队的医院,即 99.4%比 68.8%(p<0.05)。

结论和建议

我们的发现表明,即使在资源较少的环境中,手术安全检查表的实施也是可行的。自我报告的 SSC 利用率高于其他类似环境中的报告。我们将这一发现归因于所采用的基于团队的方法和持续的定期指导。我们建议在坦桑尼亚卫生部的国家外科、产科和麻醉计划(NSOAP)中推荐的其他地区使用这种方法来扩大检查表的使用。

相似文献

1
A Team-Based Approach to Introduce and Sustain the Use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Tanzania.基于团队的方法在坦桑尼亚引入和维持使用世卫组织手术安全检查表。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):689-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05292-5.
2
A prospective, observational study of the effects of implementation strategy on compliance with a surgical safety checklist.一项关于实施策略对手术安全核查表依从性影响的前瞻性观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):940-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001749. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
3
The surgical safety checklist survey: a national perspective on patient safety.手术安全核对表调查:全国范围内的患者安全视角。
Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Jun;182(2):171-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0851-4. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
4
Narrative feedback from OR personnel about the safety of their surgical practice before and after a surgical safety checklist intervention.手术室人员关于手术安全核查干预前后其手术操作安全性的叙述性反馈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):461-469. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx050.
5
Increasing compliance with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist-A regional health system's experience.提高对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性——一个区域卫生系统的经验
Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
Compliance with the World Health Organization's surgical safety checklist and related postoperative outcomes: a nationwide survey among 172 health facilities in Ethiopia.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性及相关术后结果:埃塞俄比亚172家医疗机构的全国性调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Jun 10;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00329-6.
7
Sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the WHO surgical safety checklist combined with pulse oximetry in a resource-limited setting: two-year update from Moldova.在资源有限的环境下,世界卫生组织手术安全检查表与脉搏血氧饱和度监测相结合的可持续性和长期效果:来自摩尔多瓦的两年更新。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):473-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3848.
8
How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties.世卫组织手术安全检查表如何与现有的围手术期风险管理策略相契合?一项跨外科专业的民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4965-5.
9
Does a novel method of delivering the safe surgical checklist improve compliance? A closed loop audit.新的安全手术检查表传递方法是否能提高依从性?闭环审核。
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Use of surgical safety checklists in Australian operating theatres: an observational study.澳大利亚手术室中手术安全检查表的使用:一项观察性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Dec;87(12):971-975. doi: 10.1111/ans.13638. Epub 2016 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes towards the WHO surgical safety checklist among healthcare workers in Mogadishu, Somalia.索马里摩加迪沙医护人员对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的认知与态度
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13327-y.
2
Assessing use of the WHO surgical safety checklist for pediatric surgery in Senegal: A nationwide survey.评估塞内加尔儿科手术中世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Oct 22;8(1):23-26. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-31. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
The use of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in operating theatres.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar.使用世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的可持续性:马达加斯加全国混合式教育实施策略后的混合方法纵向评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(6):e001104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001104. eCollection 2018.
2
Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.实施和评估全国范围内的手术安全检查表的推广。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e91-e102. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11034.
3
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
世界卫生组织手术安全核对表在手术室中的应用。
Health SA. 2023 Jul 31;28:2246. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2246. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving surgical safety checklist utilisation at 23 public health facilities in Ethiopia: a collaborative quality improvement project.提高埃塞俄比亚 23 家公立卫生机构手术安全检查表的使用率:合作质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Nov;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002406.
5
Mentoring approaches in a safe surgery program in Tanzania: Lessons learned during COVID-19 and recommendations for the future.坦桑尼亚安全手术项目中的指导方法:新冠疫情期间的经验教训及未来建议。
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 23;14:109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.014. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Implementation of World Health Organization behaviorally anchored rating scale and checklist utilization: promising results for LMICs.世界卫生组织行为锚定评级量表及清单的应用:对低收入和中等收入国家的良好成效
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 24;10:1204213. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1204213. eCollection 2023.
7
Scaling up of safety and quality improvement interventions in perioperative care: a systematic scoping review of implementation strategies and effectiveness.手术期护理中安全和质量改进干预措施的扩大化:实施策略和效果的系统范围界定综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Oct;7(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010649.
8
Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions.提高撒哈拉以南非洲地区外科和麻醉护理质量:基于医院的质量改进干预措施的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e062616. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062616.
9
Compliance with the World Health Organization's surgical safety checklist and related postoperative outcomes: a nationwide survey among 172 health facilities in Ethiopia.对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性及相关术后结果:埃塞俄比亚172家医疗机构的全国性调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2022 Jun 10;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-022-00329-6.
10
Building safe surgery knowledge and capacity in Cambodia: a mixed-methods evaluation of an innovative training and mentorship intervention.在柬埔寨建立安全手术知识和能力:一项创新培训和指导干预的混合方法评估。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1998996. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1998996.
WHO 手术安全检查表使用与急诊剖腹手术后死亡率的汇总分析。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e103-e112. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11051.
4
A mixed methods study of challenges in the implementation and use of the surgical safety checklist.一项关于手术安全检查表实施和使用中挑战的混合方法研究。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):832-837. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
5
The Situation of Safe Surgery and Anaesthesia in Tanzania: A Systematic Review.坦桑尼亚安全手术与麻醉状况:一项系统评价
World J Surg. 2019 Jan;43(1):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4767-7.
6
Improved Compliance and Comprehension of a Surgical Safety Checklist With Customized Versus Standard Training: A Randomized Trial.定制培训与标准培训对手术安全检查表依从性和理解性的改善效果:一项随机试验
J Patient Saf. 2018 Sep;14(3):138-142. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000183.
7
Factors associated with the use of cognitive aids in operating room crises: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers.与手术室危机中使用认知辅助工具相关的因素:对美国医院和门诊手术中心的横断面研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 26;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0739-4.
8
Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study.非洲手术结局研究中的围手术期患者结局:一项 7 天前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1589-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar.应对实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表过程中的挑战:从利用核对表培训课程促进马达加斯加快速推广中汲取的经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 29;2(Suppl 4):e000430. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430. eCollection 2017.
10
Effectiveness of the WHO SCC on improving adherence to essential practices during childbirth, in resource constrained settings.在资源受限环境下,世界卫生组织安全分娩核查表对提高分娩期间基本操作依从性的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1139-x.