Glynn Chris, Dawson David, Sanders Rosemary
Oxford Regional Pain Relief Unit, and Pain Relief Research Unit, Abingdon Hospital, Abingdon OX14 1AG U.K. Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE U.K.
Pain. 1988 Aug;34(2):123-128. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90157-1.
In a randomised double-blind study of 20 patients with chronic pain, epidural morphine 5 mg in 5 ml of saline was compared with epidural clonidine 150 micrograms in 5 ml of saline. Thirteen patients had a clinical and radiological diagnosis of arachnoiditis, 6 had low back pain and 1 had post-operative scar pain. There were 18 females and 2 males with an average age of 52 years, range 22-76 years. There was no difference found between the 2 solutions in the resultant analgesia measured by the visual analogue scale for pain, pain relief or the pain word score during the 3 h period of the study. No difference was found in the patient's mood which was also measured with the visual analogue scale. Two patients had no analgesia from either injection, 2 patients did not obtain any relief from clonidine and another 2 obtained no relief from morphine. Six patients reported that clonidine was better than morphine, 5 reported that morphine and clonidine were the same and 3 reported that morphine was better than clonidine. The duration of analgesia from the clonidine varied from 6 h to 1 month; the duration of analgesia from morphine varied from 6 to 24 h. Clonidine was associated with sedation and a fall in blood pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg in all patients, 1 patient required ephedrine to treat hypotension. Twelve patients had pruritus, 7 nausea and 2 vomiting following the morphine. Statistically there was no difference found between morphine and clonidine for short-term (3 h) analgesia in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项针对20例慢性疼痛患者的随机双盲研究中,将5毫克吗啡溶于5毫升生理盐水中的硬膜外注射与150微克可乐定溶于5毫升生理盐水中的硬膜外注射进行了比较。13例患者有蛛网膜炎的临床和放射学诊断,6例有下背痛,1例有术后瘢痕痛。有18名女性和2名男性,平均年龄52岁,年龄范围为22至76岁。在研究的3小时期间,通过疼痛视觉模拟量表测量的镇痛效果、疼痛缓解或疼痛文字评分方面,两种溶液之间未发现差异。用视觉模拟量表测量的患者情绪也未发现差异。两名患者两种注射均未产生镇痛效果,两名患者使用可乐定未获得任何缓解,另外两名患者使用吗啡未获得缓解。6例患者报告可乐定比吗啡好,5例报告吗啡和可乐定效果相同,3例报告吗啡比可乐定好。可乐定的镇痛持续时间为6小时至1个月;吗啡的镇痛持续时间为6至24小时。可乐定与所有患者的镇静作用以及血压下降超过20毫米汞柱有关,1例患者需要麻黄碱治疗低血压。12例患者在注射吗啡后出现瘙痒,7例出现恶心,2例出现呕吐。在这些患者中,吗啡和可乐定在短期(3小时)镇痛方面在统计学上没有差异。(摘要截短至250字)