Suppr超能文献

能源消耗、金融发展和投资是否有助于“一带一路”地区的生态足迹?

Does energy consumption, financial development, and investment contribute to ecological footprints in BRI regions?

机构信息

West Centre for Economic Research, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 55, Guanghuacun Street, Chengdu, 611130, China.

School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 55, Guanghuacun Street, Chengdu, 611130, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(36):36952-36966. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06772-w. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Abstract

This study applies augmented mean group (AMG) along with common correlated effect mean group (CCEMG) estimator and panel heterogeneous causality to examine the interrelationship between GDP, energy consumption, financial development, foreign investment, and ecological footprints for five Belt and Road initiative (BRI) regions and in aggregated panel of BRI over the time 1990-2016. Using a multivariate framework, this study examines four alternative and conceivable hypotheses, including Pollution haven hypothesis, environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, energy push emission hypothesis, and finance push emission hypothesis. The empirical results supported all four hypotheses for the panel of BRI and partially supported the existence of these hypotheses across the regions. Moreover, a variety of causal nexuses has been discussed in the study. Based on these results, the current research has proposed policy implications to combat the ecological footprints of BRI countries and across the regions.

摘要

本研究应用了扩展均值组(AMG)以及共同相关效应均值组(CCEMG)估计量和面板异质因果关系,以检验 GDP、能源消费、金融发展、外国投资和生态足迹之间的相互关系,研究对象为五个“一带一路”倡议(BRI)地区以及 1990-2016 年期间的 BRI 综合面板。本研究使用多元框架检验了四个替代的、可想象的假说,包括污染避难所假说、环境库兹涅茨曲线假说、能源推动排放假说和金融推动排放假说。实证结果支持了 BRI 面板的所有四个假说,并且在一定程度上支持了这些假说在各地区的存在。此外,本研究还讨论了各种因果关系。基于这些结果,本研究提出了政策建议,以应对“一带一路”国家和各地区的生态足迹问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验