Suppr超能文献

衡量中国县级疾病预防控制中心公共卫生人力的不平等。

Measuring inequalities in the public health workforce at county-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China.

机构信息

Research Institute of Health Development Strategies & Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Fudan University, 177 box, 130 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health and Management, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 21;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1073-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The public health workforce (PHW) is a key component of a country's public health system. Since the outbreak of SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) in 2003, the scale of PHW in China has been continuously expanding, but policymakers and researchers still focus on the distribution of public health personnel, especially the regional inequality in such distribution. We aimed to identify the root cause of PHW inequality by decomposing different geographical units in China.

METHODS

This study was based on data from a nationwide survey, which included 2712 county-level data. The distribution of the PHW in geographical units was evaluated by the Gini coefficient and Theil T index, and inequalities at regional, provincial, and municipal levels were decomposed to identify the root causes of inequalities in the PHW. Additionally, the contextual factors affecting the distribution of the PHW were determined through regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall inequality results show that health professional and field epidemiological investigators faced worse inequality than the staff. In particular, field epidemiological investigators had a Gini coefficient close to 0.4. Step decomposition showed that within-region inequalities accounted for 98.5% or more of overall inter-county inequality in the distribution of all PHW categories; provincial decomposition showed that at least 74% of inequality is still distributed within provinces; the overall contribution of within-municipal inequality and between-municipal inequality was basically the same. Further, the contextual factor that influenced between-municipality and within-municipality inequality for all three categories of PHWs was the agency building area per employee. Per capita GDP had a similar effect, except for between-municipality inequality of professionals and within-municipality inequality of field epidemiological investigators.

CONCLUSIONS

The successive decomposition showed that inequality is mainly concentrated in counties at the within-province and within-municipal levels. This study clearly suggests that the government, especially the municipal government at the provincial level, should increase financial investment in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) with worse resource allocation in their jurisdiction through various ways of compensation and incentives, enhance their infrastructure, and improve the salary of personnel in these institutions, to attract more public health professionals to these institutions.

摘要

背景

公共卫生人力(PHW)是国家公共卫生系统的关键组成部分。自 2003 年 SARS(严重急性呼吸综合征)爆发以来,中国 PHW 的规模不断扩大,但政策制定者和研究人员仍然关注公共卫生人员的分布,特别是这种分布的区域不平等。我们旨在通过分解中国不同的地理单位来确定 PHW 不平等的根本原因。

方法

本研究基于一项全国性调查的数据,该调查包括 2712 个县级数据。通过基尼系数和泰尔 T 指数评估 PHW 在地理单位中的分布,并对区域、省级和市级水平的不平等进行分解,以确定 PHW 不平等的根本原因。此外,通过回归分析确定影响 PHW 分布的背景因素。

结果

总体不平等结果表明,卫生专业人员和现场流行病学调查员面临的不平等比其他人员更为严重。特别是,现场流行病学调查员的基尼系数接近 0.4。逐步分解表明,在县级范围内的不平等占所有 PHW 类别分布的县际总不平等的 98.5%以上;省级分解表明,至少 74%的不平等仍分布在省内;全市范围内的不平等和市际之间的不平等的总体贡献基本相同。此外,影响所有三类 PHW 的市际和市内不平等的背景因素是每个员工的机构建设面积。人均国内生产总值也有类似的影响,除了专业人员的市际不平等和现场流行病学调查员的市内不平等。

结论

连续分解表明,不平等主要集中在省内和县内的县。本研究清楚地表明,政府,特别是省级的市级政府,应通过各种补偿和激励方式,增加对其管辖范围内疾病预防控制中心(CDC)资源分配较差的财政投资,加强其基础设施,并提高这些机构人员的工资,以吸引更多的公共卫生专业人员到这些机构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1330/6873429/0c510fd5f65d/12939_2019_1073_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验