Suppr超能文献

观察性队列研究调查英国成人哮喘中专科意见转介未满足需求和等待时间(UNTWIST 哮喘)。

Observational cohort study to investigate the unmet need and time waiting for referral for specialist opinion in adult asthma in England (UNTWIST asthma).

机构信息

Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

University of Liverpool Department of Health Services Research, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e031740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031740.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate how many patients with asthma in England met the referral eligibility criteria using national asthma guidelines, identify what proportion were referred and determine the average waiting time to referral.

DESIGN

This is an observational cohort study.

SETTING/DATA SOURCES: Routinely collected healthcare data were provided by Clinical Practice Research Datalink records and Hospital Episode Statistics records from January 2007 to December 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with asthma aged 18-80 years participated in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Eligibility for referral by the British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/SIGN) 2016 guidelines, determined after a 3-month pharmacological therapy exposure assessment, was classed by either 'high-dose therapies', 'continuous or frequent use of oral steroids' or 'incident eligibility' during follow-up (continuous oral corticosteroids for more than 3 months, or ≥800 µg/day inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonist (or three controllers) and ≥2 asthma attacks/year).

RESULTS

From the final cohort (n=23293), 19837 patients were eligible for specialist referral during follow-up based on the BTS/SIGN guideline recommendations. Among eligible patients without any previously recorded referral, 4% were referred during follow-up, with a median waiting time of 880 days (IQR=1428 days) between eligibility and referral.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of patients with asthma were eligible for specialist referral, of which a small proportion were referred, and many experienced a long waiting time before referral. The results indicate a major unmet need in asthma referral, which is a potential source of preventable harm and are likely to have implications regarding how services are organised to address this unmet need.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据英国国家哮喘指南,估算有多少名英格兰哮喘患者符合转诊资格标准,确定有多少患者被转诊,并确定转诊的平均等待时间。

设计

这是一项观察性队列研究。

设置/数据来源:从 2007 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,临床实践研究数据链接记录和医院病例统计记录提供了常规收集的医疗保健数据。

参与者

年龄在 18-80 岁的哮喘患者参加了这项研究。

主要观察指标

根据英国胸科协会/苏格兰校际指南网络(BTS/SIGN)2016 指南,在 3 个月的药物治疗暴露评估后,确定符合转诊资格的患者,根据随访期间的“高剂量治疗”、“连续或频繁使用口服类固醇”或“新发病例资格”进行分类(连续口服皮质类固醇超过 3 个月,或≥800μg/天吸入皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂(或三种控制器)和≥2 次/年哮喘发作)。

结果

在最终队列(n=23293)中,根据 BTS/SIGN 指南建议,19837 名患者在随访期间符合专科转诊资格。在没有任何先前记录转诊的合格患者中,4%在随访期间被转诊,从符合资格到转诊的中位等待时间为 880 天(IQR=1428 天)。

结论

大量哮喘患者符合专科转诊资格,但只有一小部分患者被转诊,而且许多患者在转诊前等待时间较长。结果表明哮喘转诊存在大量未满足的需求,这是潜在的可预防伤害源,可能对如何组织服务以满足这一未满足的需求产生影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f2/6887034/86fec91db35c/bmjopen-2019-031740f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验