Stutterheim James, Goodier Matthew D
Department of Radiology, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa.
Department of Radiology, Grey's Hospital, South Africa.
SA J Radiol. 2018 Jun 4;22(1):1253. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v22i1.1253. eCollection 2018.
A mechanism-based approach to post-injury knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation, following acute complex knee injury, is cited by several authors to provide increased reporting accuracy and efficiency, by allowing accurate prediction of injury to at-risk structures. This remains to our knowledge untested in a developing world setting and is of interest to us as South African general radiologists.
To assess the reliability of a mechanism-based approach to complex post-trauma knee MRI interpretation when implemented by general radiologists in a South African setting, and compare our results with the findings of North American authors who compiled and assessed the same classification. To measure the agreement between the observers.
A quantitative, observational, investigative, retrospective study was performed using a sample of 50 post-trauma knee MRI studies conducted at Grey's Hospital, Pietermaritzburg. Two investigators independently applied the consolidated mechanism-based approach compiled by Hayes et al. as a research tool to interpret the knee MRI studies, blinded to each other's findings.
Injury mechanism was assigned in 32% of cases by the principle investigator and in 20% of cases by the supervisor, with fair agreement between the observers (k = 0.39). The investigators agreed that 62% of cases were not classifiable by mechanism, 26% because of highly complex injury and 26% because of non-specific findings.
Our findings indicate that the Hayes et al. classification is a non-ideal tool when used by general radiologists in our setting, as the pure injury mechanisms described in the classification were rare in our study group. Patient epidemiology and investigator experience are highlighted as potential limiting factors in this study. Despite this, we advocate that the concept of a mechanism-based approach for the interpretation of acute post-trauma knee MRI holds value for general radiologists, particularly in patients imaged before resolution of bone bruising (within 12-16 weeks of injury), and those injured in sporting and similar athletic activities.
几位作者引用了一种基于机制的方法来解读急性复杂膝关节损伤后的膝关节磁共振成像(MRI),通过准确预测高危结构的损伤情况,提高报告的准确性和效率。据我们所知,在发展中国家的环境中尚未对此进行测试,作为南非普通放射科医生,我们对此很感兴趣。
评估南非普通放射科医生采用基于机制的方法解读复杂创伤后膝关节MRI的可靠性,并将我们的结果与汇编和评估相同分类的北美作者的研究结果进行比较。测量观察者之间的一致性。
采用定量、观察性、调查性、回顾性研究,样本为在彼得马里茨堡格雷医院进行的50例创伤后膝关节MRI研究。两名研究人员独立应用海斯等人汇编的基于机制的综合方法作为研究工具来解读膝关节MRI研究,彼此对对方的结果不知情。
主要研究者在32%的病例中确定了损伤机制,监督者在20%的病例中确定了损伤机制,观察者之间的一致性一般(k = 0.39)。研究人员一致认为,62%的病例无法按机制分类,26%是因为损伤高度复杂,26%是因为结果不明确。
我们的研究结果表明,在我们的环境中,普通放射科医生使用海斯等人的分类方法并非理想工具,因为分类中描述的纯粹损伤机制在我们的研究组中很少见。患者流行病学和研究者经验被强调为这项研究中的潜在限制因素。尽管如此,我们主张基于机制的方法解读急性创伤后膝关节MRI的概念对普通放射科医生具有价值,特别是对于在骨挫伤消退前(受伤后12 - 16周内)成像的患者,以及在体育和类似体育活动中受伤的患者。