• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习方法构建数字护理管理可预测性框架。

A Framework for Predicting Impactability of Digital Care Management Using Machine Learning Methods.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Wellframe, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2020 Aug;23(4):319-325. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0132. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1089/pop.2019.0132
PMID:31765282
Abstract

Digital care management programs can reduce health care costs and improve quality of care. However, it is unclear how to target patients who are most likely to benefit from these programs ex ante, a shortcoming of current "risk score"-based approaches across many interventions. This study explores a framework to define impactability by using machine learning (ML) models to identify those patients most likely to benefit from a digital health intervention for care management. Anonymized insurance claims data were used from a commercially insured population across several US states and combined with inferred sociodemographic data. The approach involves creating 2 models and the comparative analysis of the methodologies and performances therein. The authors first train a cost prediction model to calculate the differences in predicted (without intervention) versus actual (with onboarding onto digital health platform) health care expenditures for patients (N 5600). This enables classification impactability if differences in predicted versus actual costs meet a predetermined threshold. Several random forest and logistic regression machine learning models were then trained to accurately categorize new patients as impactable versus not impactable. These parameters are modified through grid search to define the parameters that deliver optimal performance, reaching an overall sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.65 among all models. This approach shows that impactability for a digital health intervention can be successfully defined using ML methods, thus enabling efficient allocation of resources. This framework is generalizable to analyzing impactability of any intervention and can contribute to realizing closed-loop feedback systems for continuous improvement in health care.

摘要

数字护理管理程序可以降低医疗保健成本并提高护理质量。然而,目前许多干预措施都基于“风险评分”,不清楚如何针对最有可能从这些程序中受益的患者进行预先定位,这是一个缺点。本研究探讨了一种通过使用机器学习 (ML) 模型来确定最有可能从数字健康干预措施中受益于护理管理的患者的定义可影响性的框架。使用来自美国多个州的商业保险人群的匿名保险索赔数据,并结合推断的社会人口统计学数据。该方法涉及创建 2 个模型,并对其中的方法和性能进行比较分析。作者首先训练一个成本预测模型,以计算患者(N=5600)的预测(无干预)与实际(加入数字健康平台)医疗支出之间的差异。如果预测成本与实际成本之间的差异达到预定阈值,则可以进行分类可影响性。然后,训练了几个随机森林和逻辑回归机器学习模型,以准确地将新患者分类为可影响性与不可影响性。通过网格搜索修改这些参数,以定义提供最佳性能的参数,所有模型的总体灵敏度为 0.77,特异性为 0.65。该方法表明,使用 ML 方法可以成功定义数字健康干预措施的可影响性,从而能够有效地分配资源。该框架可推广到分析任何干预措施的可影响性,并有助于实现闭环反馈系统,以持续改进医疗保健。

相似文献

1
A Framework for Predicting Impactability of Digital Care Management Using Machine Learning Methods.利用机器学习方法构建数字护理管理可预测性框架。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Aug;23(4):319-325. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0132. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Active Redesign of a Medicaid Care Management Strategy for Greater Return on Investment: Predicting Impactability.为提高投资回报率对医疗补助护理管理策略进行积极重新设计:预测可影响性。
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Apr;21(2):102-109. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0122. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
4
Applications of Machine Learning in Real-Life Digital Health Interventions: Review of the Literature.机器学习在现实生活中的数字健康干预中的应用:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12286. doi: 10.2196/12286.
5
Closing the Digital Health Evidence Gap: Development of a Predictive Score to Maximize Patient Outcomes.弥合数字健康证据差距:开发预测评分以最大化患者结局。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Sep;27(9):1029-1038. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0334. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Predicting Dropouts From an Electronic Health Platform for Lifestyle Interventions: Analysis of Methods and Predictors.预测生活方式干预电子健康平台上的退出者:方法与预测因素分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 4;21(9):e13617. doi: 10.2196/13617.
8
Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions: Machine Learning Approach.开发一种用于分析用户旅程和预测数字健康干预措施中辍学的方法:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17738. doi: 10.2196/17738.
9
Comparison of statistical machine learning models for rectal protocol compliance in prostate external beam radiation therapy.统计机器学习模型在前列腺外照射放疗中直肠协议依从性比较。
Med Phys. 2020 Apr;47(4):1452-1459. doi: 10.1002/mp.14044. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Remote Health Monitoring Outcome Success Prediction Using Baseline and First Month Intervention Data.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Mar;21(2):507-514. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2518673. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of understanding of impactibility analysis and application through workshops to inform model design for population health management policy: a qualitative assessment.通过研讨会探索对可影响性分析的理解和应用,以为人口健康管理政策模型设计提供信息:定性评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 22;14(5):e067541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067541.
2
A Critical Review of Global Digital Divide and the Role of Technology in Healthcare.全球数字鸿沟与技术在医疗保健中的作用的批判性综述
Cureus. 2022 Sep 29;14(9):e29739. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29739. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Bridging the impactibility gap in population health management: a systematic review.
弥合人群健康管理中的可及性差距:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052455.
4
Artificial Intelligence, Data Sensors and Interconnectivity: Future Opportunities for Heart Failure.人工智能、数据传感器与互联互通:心力衰竭的未来机遇
Card Fail Rev. 2020 May 12;6:e11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.14. eCollection 2020 Mar.