Suppr超能文献

测量患者赋权——系统评价。

Measuring patient empowerment - A systematic review.

机构信息

University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science and Clinical Nurse Specialist, Turku University Hospital, Finland.

University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science and Principal Lecturer, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Finland.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):777-787. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify generic instruments measuring patient empowerment and related concepts and analyse the main content and psychometric properties of these instruments.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using empowerment and related concepts (enablement, activation, engagement, perceived control) as search terms. The main content of the instruments was analysed by classifying the subscales and items of the elements of empowerment into patient's capacities, patient's knowledge, patient's behaviour and support by others. Psychometric properties were analysed with the criteria of Terwee and colleagues (2007).

RESULTS

Thirteen instruments were identified; and out of them, five instruments covered all the four elements used to define of empowerment. Psychometric properties were variable; none of the instruments contained all the evaluated psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION

There are generic instruments measuring empowerment and its related concepts. The instruments were heterogeneous in structure and psychometric properties. Empowerment is more wide-ranging and multidimensional than its related concepts.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This review provides knowledge for healthcare professionals and researchers who want to support or evaluate patients' empowerment. With a generic instrument, it is possible to obtain comparable information from diverse patient groups. Further testing of psychometric properties of each instrument is recommended.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在确定用于测量患者赋权及相关概念的通用工具,并分析这些工具的主要内容和心理测量特性。

方法

使用赋权和相关概念(赋权、激活、参与、感知控制)作为检索词进行系统检索。通过将赋权要素的分量表和条目划分为患者能力、患者知识、患者行为和他人支持,对工具的主要内容进行分析。使用 Terwee 等人(2007 年)的标准分析心理测量特性。

结果

确定了 13 种工具;其中,有 5 种工具涵盖了定义赋权的所有四个要素。心理测量特性各不相同;没有一种工具包含所有评估的心理测量特性。

结论

有用于测量赋权及其相关概念的通用工具。这些工具在结构和心理测量特性方面存在异质性。赋权比其相关概念更广泛和多维。

实践意义

本综述为希望支持或评估患者赋权的医疗保健专业人员和研究人员提供了知识。使用通用工具,可以从不同的患者群体中获得可比的信息。建议进一步测试每种工具的心理测量特性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验