• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预期和注意力要求较高的任务对酒精中毒的干扰。

Interference of expectancy and attention demanding tasks on alcohol intoxication.

作者信息

Silva-Filho A R, Masur J

机构信息

Departamento de Psicobiologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo Brazil.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 1988;13(3):285-9. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90055-x.

DOI:10.1016/0306-4603(88)90055-x
PMID:3177072
Abstract

Seventy-nine undergraduate social drinkers were the subjects in two studies. Both studies had two experimental sessions and followed a blind design. The subjects in experiment I (expectancy manipulation) were informed they would certainly receive an alcoholic beverage in one session, while in the other one they were told the beverage possibly contained alcohol. Thus, the different expectancy on the beverage content was evaluated. The volunteers in experiment II (attention demanding tasks) were submitted to attention tests in one session and in another one they were not. Thus, the assumption that tasks would motivate the subjects to stay more sober and rate themselves as less intoxicated was studied. Each subject received one of three alcohol doses (0.0; 0.4 or 0.6 g/kg): the same dose in both sessions of each experiment. Blood alcohol level (BAL), reaction time, and self-rating intoxication scores were recorded. The variables studied did not alter either BAL or reaction time values. The expectancy manipulation changed the self-rated intoxication with the lower alcohol dose (0.4 g/kg). So when doubt had been raised the subjects rated themselves as less intoxicated. However, this change was only found with a verbal scale. The attention demanding tasks manipulation did not change the self-rating evaluations. It is suggested that the tasks performed were not appropriate to motivate the subjects to stay sober. The differential sensitivity of the self-rating intoxication scales utilized, and the role of alcohol dose in the study of nonpharmacological variables are discussed.

摘要

79名本科社交饮酒者是两项研究的受试者。两项研究均有两个实验环节,且采用了盲法设计。实验一(预期操纵)的受试者被告知他们在一个环节肯定会喝到酒精饮料,而在另一个环节则被告知饮料可能含有酒精。由此评估对饮料成分的不同预期。实验二(需要注意力的任务)的志愿者在一个环节接受注意力测试,在另一个环节则不接受。由此研究任务是否会促使受试者保持更清醒并自我评价为醉酒程度较低的假设。每个受试者接受三种酒精剂量之一(0.0;0.4或0.6克/千克):在每个实验的两个环节中剂量相同。记录血液酒精浓度(BAL)、反应时间和自我评定的醉酒分数。所研究的变量并未改变BAL或反应时间值。预期操纵改变了较低酒精剂量(0.4克/千克)时的自我评定醉酒程度。所以当产生疑问时,受试者会自我评价为醉酒程度较低。然而,这种变化仅在言语量表中出现。需要注意力的任务操纵并未改变自我评定结果。研究表明所执行的任务不足以促使受试者保持清醒。文中还讨论了所使用的自我评定醉酒量表的差异敏感性,以及酒精剂量在非药理学变量研究中的作用。

相似文献

1
Interference of expectancy and attention demanding tasks on alcohol intoxication.预期和注意力要求较高的任务对酒精中毒的干扰。
Addict Behav. 1988;13(3):285-9. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90055-x.
2
The balanced placebo design: effects of alcohol and beverage instructions cannot be independently assessed.平衡安慰剂设计:酒精和饮料说明的效果无法独立评估。
Int J Addict. 1991 Sep;26(9):963-72. doi: 10.3109/10826089109058933.
3
Some boundary conditions for effective use of alcohol placebos.有效使用酒精安慰剂的一些边界条件。
J Stud Alcohol. 1990 Nov;51(6):500-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1990.51.500.
4
Drinking restraint and alcohol-related outcomes: exploring the contributions of beverage instructions, beverage content and self-monitoring.饮酒节制与酒精相关后果:探究饮料说明、饮料成分及自我监测的作用。
J Stud Alcohol. 1996 Sep;57(5):563-71. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.563.
5
Factors affecting the perception of intoxication: dose, tolerance, and setting.影响醉酒认知的因素:剂量、耐受性和环境。
Addict Behav. 1984;9(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(84)90049-2.
6
Predicting alcohol impairment: perceived intoxication versus BAC.预测酒精损害:自我感知的醉酒程度与血液酒精浓度的比较
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992 Aug;16(4):747-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb00671.x.
7
Alcohol and visual performance.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;23(3):465-82. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(99)00009-3.
8
Effects of alcohol on self-appraisal.酒精对自我评估的影响。
Int J Addict. 1994 Jan;29(1):127-33. doi: 10.3109/10826089409047373.
9
Differences in alcohol expectancy between aggressive and nonaggressive social drinkers.攻击性与非攻击性社交饮酒者在酒精预期方面的差异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Dec;22(9):1943-50.
10
Interactive effects of contextual cues and acute alcohol intoxication on the associations between alcohol expectancy activation and urge to drink.情境线索与急性酒精中毒对酒精预期激活与饮酒冲动之间关联的交互作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;22(5):407-18. doi: 10.1037/a0037606. Epub 2014 Aug 11.