Department of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Malar J. 2019 Nov 26;18(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2998-1.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of parasitological diagnosis of malaria for all age groups in all malaria transmission settings. Many private health facilities rely on malaria microscopy for malaria diagnosis. However, quality of malaria microscopy is affected by number of factors including availability of skilled laboratory microscopists and lack of quality assurance systems in many malaria endemic countries. This study was carried out to assess quality of malaria microscopy in selected private health facilities in Tanzania.
A cross sectional study was conducted from August to September, 2017. A total of 40 private health laboratories in five regions were invited to participate in the study. Data were collected by distributing standardized pre-validated malaria slide-panels to each health facility. Sensitivity, specificity, and strength of agreement (with kappa score) were calculated to assess performance in detecting and quantification of Plasmodium species.
Among the 40 health facilities, 31 (77.5%) returned their results to the reference centre (Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences). Overall, the measures of malaria diagnostic accuracy were high, i.e. the sensitivity and specificity of malaria parasite detection by microscopy in the health facilities were 84.3% (95% CI 77-90) and 90.8% (95% CI 83.3-95.7), respectively. There was substantial agreement in parasite detection with (Kappa value: 0.74 (95% 0.65-0.83). However, only 17.8% (24 of 134) of blood slides were interpreted correctly at the health facilities in terms of parasite density counts.
Although there was substantial agreement between the private health microscopists and experienced microscopists in malaria parasite detection, there was poor performance in parasite counts. This calls for regular in-service training and external quality assessments at private health facilities to enhance the skills of private health facility microscopists in malaria microscopy.
世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在所有疟疾传播地区和所有年龄段的人群中使用寄生虫学诊断疟疾。许多私人医疗机构依赖疟疾显微镜检查来诊断疟疾。然而,疟疾显微镜检查的质量受到许多因素的影响,包括熟练的实验室显微镜专家的可用性以及许多疟疾流行国家缺乏质量保证系统。本研究旨在评估坦桑尼亚选定的私人医疗机构中疟疾显微镜检查的质量。
本研究于 2017 年 8 月至 9 月进行了横断面研究。邀请了五个地区的 40 家私人卫生实验室参加研究。通过向每家医疗机构分发标准化的预验证疟疾玻片面板来收集数据。计算敏感性、特异性和一致性(kappa 评分),以评估检测和定量疟原虫种类的性能。
在 40 家医疗机构中,有 31 家(77.5%)将结果返回给参考中心(姆希比利大学健康与联合科学大学)。总体而言,疟疾诊断准确性的各项措施都很高,即医疗机构镜检疟原虫检测的敏感性和特异性分别为 84.3%(95%置信区间 77-90)和 90.8%(95%置信区间 83.3-95.7)。在寄生虫检测方面存在显著的一致性(kappa 值:0.74(95%置信区间 0.65-0.83)。然而,在医疗机构中,只有 17.8%(134 个血片中的 24 个)正确解释了寄生虫密度计数。
尽管私人医疗机构的显微镜检查人员与经验丰富的显微镜检查人员在疟疾寄生虫检测方面存在显著的一致性,但在寄生虫计数方面的表现不佳。这呼吁在私人医疗机构中定期开展在职培训和外部质量评估,以提高私人医疗机构显微镜检查人员在疟疾显微镜检查方面的技能。