Suppr超能文献

选择性、逐步性或非选择性去除龋坏组织:哪种技术在治疗恒牙龋齿时风险更低?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Selective, stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, St. Conselheiro José Júlio, Sobral, Ceará, Brazil.

Faculty of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, St. Alexandre Baraúna, 949, Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03114-5. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the risk of selective removal-in comparison with stepwise and nonselective removal-of carious tissue in permanent teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Controlled clinical trials and cohort studies involving patients with dental caries in permanent teeth were included. Databases used were PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The test group should be composed of patients undergoing selective removal of carious tissues, and the control group should comprise patients undergoing nonselective removal and/or stepwise removal of carious tissue. Laboratory tests, studies on primary teeth, and studies that used temporary restorations were excluded, as were literature reviews. The primary outcome was overall success of maintaining pulpal health (both clinically and radiographically). Quality of the restoration, pulp exposure, dentin deposition, and microbiological examination were also assessed. A meta-analysis, using the pooled risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), was performed to assess the success of maintaining pulpal health, using the different control treatments as a subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2333 articles were retrieved, of which 10 were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. In the qualitative evaluation, the control groups presented a higher risk of pulp exposure in relation to the selective removal. In the meta-analysis, the selective carious tissue removal showed significantly higher overall success (RR, 95% CI 1.11, 1.02-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The selective carious tissue removal presented higher success of maintaining pulpal health.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In permanent teeth, selective carious tissue removal should be performed, as this technique results in lower numbers of pulp complications, such as pulp exposure, as compared with nonselective removal.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾有关恒牙龋病选择性去腐(与逐步去腐和非选择性去腐相比)风险的文献。

材料和方法

纳入了涉及恒牙龋病患者的对照临床试验和队列研究。使用的数据库包括 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus。实验组应由接受龋病组织选择性去除的患者组成,对照组应由接受非选择性去除和/或逐步去除龋病组织的患者组成。排除了实验室试验、乳牙研究以及使用临时修复体的研究,以及文献综述。主要结局是保持牙髓健康(临床和放射学)的总体成功率。还评估了修复质量、牙髓暴露、牙本质沉积和微生物学检查。使用汇总风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析,以评估不同对照组作为亚组分析时保持牙髓健康的成功率。

结果

共检索到 2333 篇文章,其中 10 篇被纳入系统评价,4 篇被纳入荟萃分析。在定性评价中,与选择性去除相比,对照组的牙髓暴露风险更高。荟萃分析显示,选择性龋病组织去除的总体成功率显著更高(RR,95%CI 1.11,1.02-1.21)。

结论

选择性龋病组织去除可保持牙髓健康,成功率更高。

临床相关性

在恒牙中,应进行选择性龋病组织去除,因为与非选择性去除相比,该技术可降低牙髓并发症(如牙髓暴露)的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验