Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
J Neural Eng. 2019 Dec 17;17(1):016013. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab5cf3.
Tetraplegic patients using brain-machine interfaces can make visually guided reaches with robotic arms. However, restoring proprioceptive feedback to these patients will be critical, as evidenced by the movement deficit in patients with proprioceptive loss. Proprioception is critical in large part because it provides faster feedback than vision. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach, but the ICMS-evoked reaction time (RT) is typically slower than that to natural proprioceptive and often even visual cues, implying that ICMS feedback may not be fast enough to guide movement.
For most sensory modalities, RT decreases with increased stimulus intensity. Thus, it may be that stimulation intensities beyond what has previously been used will result in faster RTs. To test this, we compared the RT to ICMS applied through multi-electrode arrays in area 2 of somatosensory cortex to that of mechanical and visual cues.
We found that the RT to single-electrode ICMS decreased with increased current, frequency, and train length. For 100 µA, 330 Hz stimulation, the highest single-electrode intensity we tested routinely, most electrodes resulted in RTs slower than the mechanical cue but slightly faster than the visual cue. While increasing the current beyond 100 µA resulted in faster RTs, sustained stimulation at this level may damage tissue. Alternatively, by stimulating through multiple electrodes (mICMS), a large amount of current can be injected while keeping that through each electrode at a safe level. We found that stimulation with at least 480 µA equally distributed over 16 electrodes could produce RTs as much as 20 ms faster than the mechanical cue, roughly the conduction delay to cortex from the periphery.
These results suggest that mICMS may provide a means to supply rapid, movement-related feedback. Future neuroprosthetics may need spatiotemporally patterned mICMS to convey useful somatosensory information. Novelty & Significance Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach for providing artificial somatosensation to patients with spinal cord injury or limb amputation, but in prior experiments, subjects have been unable to respond as quickly to it as to natural cues. We have investigated the use of multi-electrode stimulation (mICMS) and discovered that it can produce reaction times as fast or faster even than natural mechanical cues. Although our stimulus trains were not modulated in time, this result opens the door to more complex spatiotemporal patterns of mICMS that might be used to rapidly write in complex somatosensory information to the CNS.
使用脑机接口的四肢瘫痪患者可以使用机械臂进行视觉引导的伸展。然而,向这些患者恢复本体感觉反馈将是至关重要的,因为失去本体感觉的患者会出现运动缺陷。本体感觉在很大程度上是至关重要的,因为它提供的反馈速度比视觉快。皮层内微刺激(ICMS)是一种很有前途的方法,但 ICMS 诱发的反应时间(RT)通常比自然本体感觉甚至视觉线索慢,这意味着 ICMS 反馈可能不够快,无法指导运动。
对于大多数感觉模式,RT 随刺激强度的增加而降低。因此,可能是以前使用的刺激强度会导致更快的 RT。为了检验这一点,我们比较了通过躯体感觉皮层 2 区的多电极阵列施加的 ICMS 与机械和视觉线索的 RT。
我们发现,单个电极 ICMS 的 RT 随电流、频率和训练长度的增加而降低。对于 100µA、330Hz 的刺激,这是我们常规测试的最高单个电极强度,大多数电极的 RT 比机械线索慢,但比视觉线索稍快。虽然超过 100µA 的电流会导致更快的 RT,但在该水平持续刺激可能会损伤组织。或者,通过刺激多个电极(mICMS),可以在保持每个电极电流处于安全水平的情况下,注入大量电流。我们发现,至少 480µA 的电流均匀分布在 16 个电极上,可以产生比机械线索快 20ms 的 RT,大致与从外周到皮层的传导延迟相当。
这些结果表明,mICMS 可能提供一种快速提供与运动相关反馈的方法。未来的神经假肢可能需要时空模式的 mICMS 来传递有用的躯体感觉信息。新颖性和意义 皮层内微刺激(ICMS)是为脊髓损伤或肢体截肢患者提供人工感觉的一种很有前途的方法,但在以前的实验中,受试者无法像对自然线索那样快速做出反应。我们研究了多电极刺激(mICMS)的使用,并发现即使与自然机械线索相比,它也能产生更快或更快的反应时间。尽管我们的刺激序列没有时间调制,但这一结果为更复杂的 mICMS 时空模式打开了大门,这些模式可能被用于快速向中枢神经系统写入复杂的躯体感觉信息。