Bhagawati Mrinalini, Paul Sudip, Mantella Laura, Johri Amer M, Laird John R, Singh Inder M, Singh Rajesh, Garg Deepak, Fouda Mostafa M, Khanna Narendra N, Cau Riccardo, Abraham Ajith, Al-Maini Mostafa, Isenovic Esma R, Sharma Aditya M, Fernandes Jose Fernandes E, Chaturvedi Seemant, Karla Mannudeep K, Nicolaides Andrew, Saba Luca, Suri Jasjit S
Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;40(6):1283-1303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
The quantification of carotid plaque has been routinely used to predict cardiovascular risk in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). To determine how well carotid plaque features predict the likelihood of CAD and cardiovascular (CV) events using deep learning (DL) and compare against the machine learning (ML) paradigm. The participants in this study consisted of 459 individuals who had undergone coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, and focused carotid B-mode ultrasound. Each patient was tracked for thirty days. The measurements on these patients consisted of maximum plaque height (MPH), total plaque area (TPA), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), and intraplaque neovascularization (IPN). CAD risk and CV event stratification were performed by applying eight types of DL-based models. Univariate and multivariate analysis was also conducted to predict the most significant risk predictors. The DL's model effectiveness was evaluated by the area-under-the-curve measurement while the CV event prediction was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model (CPHM) and compared against the DL-based concordance index (c-index). IPN showed a substantial ability to predict CV events (p < 0.0001). The best DL system improved by 21% (0.929 vs. 0.762) over the best ML system. DL-based CV event prediction showed a ~ 17% increase in DL-based c-index compared to the CPHM (0.86 vs. 0.73). CAD and CV incidents were linked to IPN and carotid imaging characteristics. For survival analysis and CAD prediction, the DL-based system performs superior to ML-based models.
颈动脉斑块的量化已被常规用于预测心血管疾病(CVD)和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中的心血管风险。为了确定颈动脉斑块特征如何利用深度学习(DL)预测CAD和心血管(CV)事件的可能性,并与机器学习(ML)范式进行比较。本研究的参与者包括459名接受过冠状动脉造影、对比增强超声检查和聚焦颈动脉B模式超声检查的个体。对每位患者进行了30天的跟踪。对这些患者的测量包括最大斑块高度(MPH)、总斑块面积(TPA)、颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)和斑块内新生血管形成(IPN)。通过应用八种基于DL的模型进行CAD风险和CV事件分层。还进行了单变量和多变量分析以预测最显著的风险预测因素。DL模型的有效性通过曲线下面积测量进行评估,而CV事件预测则使用Cox比例风险模型(CPHM)进行评估,并与基于DL的一致性指数(c-index)进行比较。IPN显示出预测CV事件的强大能力(p < 0.0001)。最佳的DL系统比最佳的ML系统提高了21%(0.929对0.762)。与CPHM相比,基于DL的CV事件预测显示基于DL的c-index增加了约17%(0.86对0.73)。CAD和CV事件与IPN及颈动脉成像特征相关。对于生存分析和CAD预测,基于DL的系统比基于ML的模型表现更优。