Suppr超能文献

找到解决棘手问题的方法:疫苗、接种疫苗和共同理解。

Finding a way to address a wicked problem: vaccines, vaccination, and a shared understanding.

机构信息

Immunization Action Coalition, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1030-1033. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1695458. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

Abstract

A wicked problem is a complex one with innumerable causes, is difficult to describe, and does not have a right answer. Addressing vaccine hesitancy is a wicked problem that has existed since smallpox inoculation began in 1796. Spurred by a now-discredited and retracted paper by Wakefield, . in 1998 and facilitated by the ease of connectivity through social media, distrust in vaccination is highly publicized, currently contributing to the largest measles outbreak in the United States since 1994, threatening public health as more vaccine-preventable diseases may be on the rise. Research to address vaccine hesitancy has been focused on building vaccine confidence, understanding the effects of diseases themselves, who is trusted to make a recommendation (i.e. health-care professionals), the need for a strong recommendation, and characteristics of hesitant parents (e.g. values). Strategies focused on disease education and strong provider recommendations have had limited impact on increasing coverage rates and provide little insight into the underlying drivers to vaccination decision-making. With the goal of enhancing public trust and provider effectiveness in conversations between providers and parents, new frameworks are needed to build a richer understanding of provider-parent conversations around vaccination and vaccine decision-making.

摘要

棘手问题是一种复杂的问题,其存在无数的原因,难以描述,也没有正确答案。解决疫苗犹豫问题是一个棘手的问题,自 1796 年天花接种开始以来就一直存在。1998 年,由于 Wakefield 一篇现已被撤回的有争议的论文的推动,以及社交媒体的便捷连接性的促进,人们对疫苗的不信任被大肆宣传,这导致了美国自 1994 年以来最大的麻疹疫情爆发,威胁着公众健康,因为更多可通过疫苗预防的疾病可能会呈上升趋势。针对疫苗犹豫的研究一直集中在建立疫苗信心、了解疾病本身的影响、谁被信任来做出推荐(即医疗保健专业人员)、强烈推荐的必要性以及犹豫的父母的特征(例如价值观)上。专注于疾病教育和强有力的推荐的策略对提高覆盖率的影响有限,并且对疫苗决策背后的潜在驱动因素几乎没有深入了解。为了增强公众信任和提供者在提供者和父母之间的对话中的有效性,需要新的框架来更深入地了解围绕疫苗接种和疫苗决策的提供者-父母对话。

相似文献

2
Communicating With Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Narrative Review.与疫苗犹豫家长沟通:叙事综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S24-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.01.018.
7
Vaccine hesitancy: Causes, consequences, and a call to action.疫苗犹豫:原因、后果及行动呼吁。
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33 Suppl 4:D66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.035.
10
Determinants of parental vaccine hesitancy.父母疫苗犹豫的决定因素。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 May;67(5):339-341. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6705339.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy.道德价值观与疫苗犹豫的关联。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Dec;1(12):873-880. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.疫苗犹豫:定义、范围及决定因素
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验