Suppr超能文献

提高异花授粉作物的遗传增益 快速育种与基因组选择

Boosting Genetic Gain in Allogamous Crops Speed Breeding and Genomic Selection.

作者信息

Jighly Abdulqader, Lin Zibei, Pembleton Luke W, Cogan Noel O I, Spangenberg German C, Hayes Ben J, Daetwyler Hans D

机构信息

Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora,VIC, Australia.

School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora,VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 15;10:1364. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01364. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Breeding schemes that utilize modern breeding methods like genomic selection (GS) and speed breeding (SB) have the potential to accelerate genetic gain for different crops. We investigated through stochastic computer simulation the advantages and disadvantages of adopting both GS and SB (SpeedGS) into commercial breeding programs for allogamous crops. In addition, we studied the effect of omitting one or two selection stages from the conventional phenotypic scheme on GS accuracy, genetic gain, and inbreeding. As an example, we simulated GS and SB for five traits (heading date, forage yield, seed yield, persistency, and quality) with different genetic architectures and heritabilities (0.7, 0.3, 0.4, 0.1, and 0.3; respectively) for a tall fescue breeding program. We developed a new method to simulate correlated traits with complex architectures of which effects can be sampled from multiple distributions, e.g. to simulate the presence of both minor and major genes. The phenotypic selection scheme required 11 years, while the proposed SpeedGS schemes required four to nine years per cycle. Generally, SpeedGS schemes resulted in higher genetic gain per year for all traits especially for traits with low heritability such as persistency. Our results showed that running more SB rounds resulted in higher genetic gain per cycle when compared to phenotypic or GS only schemes and this increase was more pronounced per year when cycle time was shortened by omitting cycle stages. While GS accuracy declined with additional SB rounds, the decline was less in round three than in round two, and it stabilized after the fourth SB round. However, more SB rounds resulted in higher inbreeding rate, which could limit long-term genetic gain. The inbreeding rate was reduced by approximately 30% when generating the initial population for each cycle through random crosses instead of generating half-sib families. Our study demonstrated a large potential for additional genetic gain from combining GS and SB. Nevertheless, methods to mitigate inbreeding should be considered for optimal utilization of these highly accelerated breeding programs.

摘要

利用基因组选择(GS)和快速育种(SB)等现代育种方法的育种方案有潜力加速不同作物的遗传增益。我们通过随机计算机模拟研究了将GS和SB(快速基因组选择,SpeedGS)应用于异花授粉作物商业育种计划的优缺点。此外,我们研究了从传统表型方案中省略一两个选择阶段对GS准确性、遗传增益和近亲繁殖的影响。作为一个例子,我们针对一个高羊茅育种计划,模拟了具有不同遗传结构和遗传力(分别为0.7、0.3、0.4、0.1和0.3)的五个性状(抽穗期、牧草产量、种子产量、持久性和品质)的GS和SB。我们开发了一种新方法来模拟具有复杂结构的相关性状,其效应可以从多个分布中抽样,例如模拟微效基因和主效基因同时存在的情况。表型选择方案需要11年,而提议的SpeedGS方案每个周期需要4到9年。一般来说,SpeedGS方案每年对所有性状都能带来更高的遗传增益,尤其是对于遗传力低的性状,如持久性。我们的结果表明,与仅采用表型或GS的方案相比,进行更多轮的SB会导致每个周期更高的遗传增益,并且当通过省略周期阶段缩短周期时间时,每年的这种增加更为明显。虽然随着SB轮数的增加GS准确性会下降,但第三轮的下降幅度小于第二轮,并且在第四轮SB之后趋于稳定。然而,更多轮的SB会导致更高的近亲繁殖率,这可能会限制长期遗传增益。当通过随机杂交而不是产生半同胞家系来为每个周期生成初始群体时,近亲繁殖率降低了约30%。我们的研究表明,将GS和SB相结合有很大的额外遗传增益潜力。然而,为了最佳利用这些高度加速的育种计划,应考虑减轻近亲繁殖的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2644/6873660/f4dbb7d39bc6/fpls-10-01364-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验