Vo Anh Tuan, Nguyen Dinh Hoang, Van Hoang Sy, Le Khoi Minh, Nguyen Thu Trang, Nguyen Vuong Lam, Nguyen Bac Hoang, Truong Binh Quang
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-1038-0.
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is becoming a gold standard and provides many advantages for patients. A learning curve is required for a surgeon to become proficient, and the exact number to overcome this curve is controversial. Our study aimed to define this number for mitral valve surgery in general, for replacement and repair separately.
A total of 204 mitral valve surgeries were performed via the right minithoracotomy approach from October 2014 to January 2019 by a single surgeon who isexperienced in conventional mitral valve surgery. Learning curves were analysed based on the trend of important variables (cross-clamp time, CPB time, ventilation time, ICU time, composite technical failure) over time, and the number of operations required was calculated by CUSUM method.
MIMVS provided an excellent outcome in the carefully selected patients, with low mortality of 0.5% and low rate of complications. The decreasing trend of the important variables were observed over the years and as the cumulative number of procedures increased. The number of operations required to overcome the learning curve was 75 to 100 cases. When considered separately, the quantity for mitral valve replacement was 60 cases, whereas valve repair necessitated at least 90 cases to have an acceptable technical complication rate.
MIMVS is an excellent choice for mitral valve surgery. However, this approach required a long learning curve for a surgeon who is experienced in conventional mitral valve surgery.
The research was registered and approved by the ethical board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, number 141/DHYD-HDDD, on April 11th 2018.
微创二尖瓣手术正成为金标准,为患者带来诸多益处。外科医生需要经历一个学习曲线才能熟练掌握该技术,而克服这一曲线所需的确切手术例数存在争议。我们的研究旨在确定二尖瓣手术总体以及二尖瓣置换和修复分别所需的例数。
2014年10月至2019年1月,由一位在传统二尖瓣手术方面经验丰富的外科医生通过右胸小切口入路共进行了204例二尖瓣手术。基于重要变量(主动脉阻断时间、体外循环时间、通气时间、重症监护病房时间、综合技术失败情况)随时间的变化趋势分析学习曲线,并采用累积和(CUSUM)法计算所需的手术例数。
在精心挑选的患者中,微创二尖瓣手术取得了优异的结果,死亡率低至0.5%,并发症发生率也低。多年来,随着手术累计例数的增加,重要变量呈下降趋势。克服学习曲线所需的手术例数为75至100例。单独来看,二尖瓣置换所需的例数为60例,而瓣膜修复至少需要90例才能使技术并发症发生率处于可接受水平。
微创二尖瓣手术是二尖瓣手术的绝佳选择。然而,对于有传统二尖瓣手术经验的外科医生来说,这种手术方式需要较长的学习曲线。
该研究于2018年4月11日由胡志明市医药大学伦理委员会注册并批准,编号为141/DHYD-HDDD。