LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, Postal Box 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, Postal Box 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33j, Postal Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):839-847. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.024. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
Increasing staff engagement level of shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia in nursing homes. Perceived importance, competence and frequency of staff members applying shared decision-making were measured. Additionally, facilitators and barriers in the implementation process were described.
In this pretest-posttest cluster randomized trial, 311 staff members from 65 Belgian nursing home wards participated. Key components of the intervention were knowledge on shared decision-making, role-play exercises and internal policies on advance care planning. Audio recordings of advance care planning conversations between residents, families and staff were compared before and after the intervention. Participants filled in questionnaires and provided feedback.
Wards demonstrated a higher level of shared decision-making after the intervention (p < 0.001) while time spent on the conversations did not increase. This effect persisted at 6 months follow-up (p < 0.001). Participants perceived shared decision-making as more important (p = 0.031) and felt more competent (p = 0.010), though frequency of use did not change (p = 0.201). High staff turnover and difficult co-operation with GP's were barriers.
Nursing home staff benefits from this training in shared decision-making.
Learning shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia is possible and sustainable in the time-constricted context of nursing homes.
提高护理院痴呆患者预先护理计划中工作人员共同决策的参与度。评估了工作人员对共同决策的感知重要性、能力和应用频率。此外,还描述了实施过程中的促进因素和障碍。
在这项预-后测试的整群随机试验中,来自比利时 65 家养老院的 311 名工作人员参与了研究。干预的关键内容包括共同决策知识、角色扮演练习和预先护理计划的内部政策。比较了居民、家庭和工作人员之间预先护理计划对话的录音,以了解干预前后的变化。参与者填写了调查问卷并提供了反馈。
干预后,病房的共同决策水平更高(p<0.001),而对话时间并未增加。这种效果在 6 个月的随访中仍然存在(p<0.001)。参与者认为共同决策更加重要(p=0.031),并且感到更有能力(p=0.010),尽管使用频率没有变化(p=0.201)。高员工流动率和与家庭医生合作困难是障碍。
养老院工作人员从这种关于痴呆患者预先护理计划的共同决策培训中受益。
在护理院时间紧张的情况下,学习预先护理计划中的共同决策是可行且可持续的。