Suppr超能文献

养老院痴呆症患者的预先护理计划中的共同决策:一项横断面研究。

Shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

LUCAS - Centre for care research & Consultancy, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8, Postal box 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33j, Postal box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01797-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making provides an approach to discuss advance care planning in a participative and informed manner, embodying the principles of person-centered care. A number of guided approaches to achieve shared decision-making already exist, such as the three-talk model. However, it is uncertain whether daily practice methods in nursing home wards for persons with dementia comply with the underpinnings of this model. It is also uncertain whether professionals consider shared decision-making to be important in this context, and whether they perceive themselves sufficiently competent to practice this approach frequently.

METHODS

The study has a cross-sectional design, with 65 wards (46 Belgian nursing homes) participating in the study. We compared nursing home professionals' and residents' perspectives on the level of shared decision-making during advance care planning conversations with ratings from external raters. Residents and professionals rated the level of shared decision-making by means of a questionnaire, which included the topic of the conversation. External raters assessed audio recordings of the conversations. Professionals filled in an additional self-report questionnaire on the importance of shared decision-making, their competence in practicing the approach, and with what frequency.

RESULTS

At ward level, professionals and residents rated the average achieved level of shared decision-making 71.53/100 (σ = 16.09) and 81.11/100 (σ = 19.18) respectively. Meanwhile, raters gave average scores of 26.97/100 (σ = 10.45). Only 23.8% of residents referred to advance care planning as the topic of the conversation. Professionals considered shared decision-making to be important (x̄=4.48/5, σ = 0.26). This result contrasted significantly with the frequency (x̄=3.48/5, σ = 0.51) and competence (x̄=3.76/5, σ = 0.27) with which these skills were practiced (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents with dementia are grateful when involved in discussing their care, but find it difficult to report what is discussed during these conversations. Receiving more information about advance care planning could provide them with the knowledge needed to prepare for such a conversation. External raters observe a discrepancy between the three-talk model and daily practice methods. Training programs should focus on providing professionals with better knowledge of and skills for shared decision-making. They should also promote team-based collaboration to increase the level of person-centered care in nursing home wards for persons with dementia.

摘要

背景

共同决策提供了一种以参与式和知情的方式讨论预先护理计划的方法,体现了以患者为中心的护理原则。已经存在一些指导方法来实现共同决策,例如三谈模型。然而,尚不确定养老院病房中护理痴呆症患者的日常实践方法是否符合该模型的基础,也不确定专业人员是否认为共同决策在这种情况下很重要,以及他们是否认为自己有足够的能力经常实践这种方法。

方法

本研究采用横断面设计,共有 65 个病房(46 家比利时养老院)参与研究。我们比较了养老院专业人员和居民对预先护理计划谈话中共同决策水平的看法,以及外部评估员的评估结果。居民和专业人员通过问卷调查对共同决策水平进行评分,其中包括谈话的主题。外部评估员评估了谈话的录音。专业人员填写了一份关于共同决策重要性、实践该方法能力以及实践频率的附加自我报告问卷。

结果

在病房层面,专业人员和居民分别对共同决策的平均实现水平进行评分,分别为 71.53/100(σ=16.09)和 81.11/100(σ=19.18)。同时,评估员的平均得分为 26.97/100(σ=10.45)。只有 23.8%的居民将预先护理计划作为谈话的主题。专业人员认为共同决策很重要(x̄=4.48/5,σ=0.26)。这一结果与他们实践这些技能的频率(x̄=3.48/5,σ=0.51)和能力(x̄=3.76/5,σ=0.27)形成鲜明对比(P<0.001)。

结论

患有痴呆症的居民在参与讨论他们的护理时会感到欣慰,但发现很难报告这些谈话中讨论的内容。为他们提供更多关于预先护理计划的信息,可以为他们提供准备此类谈话所需的知识。外部评估员观察到三谈模型和日常实践方法之间存在差异。培训计划应侧重于为专业人员提供更好的共同决策知识和技能,并促进基于团队的协作,以提高养老院痴呆症患者病房的以患者为中心的护理水平。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆患者的共同决策:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2023 May;22(4):875-909. doi: 10.1177/14713012231156976. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

10
Collaborative deliberation: a model for patient care.协作审议:一种患者护理模式。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验