Chen L, Cen Z B, Ma W Y, Jin Y L, Shu Y M, Liu Y M, Li X D
Guangzhou Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, Guangzhou 510620, China.
Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 20;37(11):866-870. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2019.11.018.
To choose various occupational health risk assessment of the mature methods at home and abroad respectively occupational health risk assessment was carried out on the 4s stores, to explore different risk assessment methods on the 4 s shop the applicability of the occupational health risk assessment. Chemical was applied on the harmful factors of occupational health risk assessment technology guideline in the composite index method, quantitative cancer risk assessment method using the guidelines for the harmful factors of occupational health risk assessment of chemical technology of composite index method, quantitative cancer risk assessment method, international commission on mining and metals (ICMM) occupational health risk assessment quantitative method and the occupational-disease-inductive operation classification to evaluate chemical factors in 4S store, Combined with on-site occupational health investigation to compare with the result of risk assessment and analysis of international mining and metals (ICMM) committee occupational health risk assessment quantitative method and the occupational-disease-inductive operation classification of 4S store to evaluate chemical factors, combined with on-site occupational health investigation comparison and analysis the result of the risk assessment. Except for 6 times, the results of ICMM matrix method and comprehensive index method were consistent, which were all higher than job classification. The other results were job classification of >of ICMM matrix method >comprehensive index method or job classification of >of ICMM matrix method. When the concentration of occupational-disease-inductive factors is lower than 1/2 limit, the risk assessment results tend to be ICMM quantitative >composite index method >operation classification. When the occupational-disease-inductive factors were involved with triphenyl, the quantitative non-carcinogenic risk assessment method was more likely to reach the conclusion that the occupational health risk was unacceptable.
为分别选用国内外成熟的各类职业健康风险评估方法，对4S店开展职业健康风险评估，探讨不同风险评估方法对4S店职业健康风险评估的适用性。采用《工作场所有害因素职业健康风险评估技术导则》中的化学物综合指数法、定量癌症风险评估方法、国际采矿与金属委员会（ICMM）职业健康风险评估定量方法以及职业病危害作业分级，对4S店内化学因素进行评估，结合现场职业健康调查，比较风险评估结果并分析国际采矿与金属委员会（ICMM）职业健康风险评估定量方法以及4S店职业病危害作业分级对化学因素的评估结果，结合现场职业健康调查比较并分析风险评估结果。除6次外，ICMM矩阵法与综合指数法结果一致，均高于作业分级。其他结果为作业分级＞ICMM矩阵法＞综合指数法或作业分级＞ICMM矩阵法。当职业病危害因素浓度低于1/2限值时，风险评估结果倾向于ICMM定量法＞综合指数法＞作业分级。当职业病危害因素涉及三苯时，定量非致癌风险评估方法更易得出职业健康风险不可接受的结论。
