School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Pharmacy, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3801-3812. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05111-6. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
To compare febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and hospitalization among breast cancer patients on docetaxel with no granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF) primary prophylaxis (PP), 4/5-day PP, or 7-day PP.
We identified 3916 breast cancer patients using docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (TC), doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide then docetaxel (AC-T), fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide then docetaxel (FEC-T), docetaxel-carboplatin-trastuzumab (TJH), or docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (TAC) from a hospital pharmacy dispensing database in Hong Kong between 2014 and 2016. Patients were offered GCSF within 5 days since administering docetaxel. Outcomes included FN incidence, time to first hospitalization, hospitalization rate, and duration.
In TC regimen, FN incidence (with odds ratio, OR) of patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 21.69%, 7.95% (OR 0.31, p < 0.001), and 5.33% (OR 0.20, p < 0.001), respectively. In TJH regimen, FN incidence of patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 38.26%, 8.33% (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), and 8.57% (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), respectively. FN incidence of patients on AC-T regimen with no PP and 4/5-day PP was 20.93% and 6.84%, respectively (OR 0.28, p = 0.005); with FEC-T regimen, the incidence was 9.91% and 4.77%, respectively (OR 0.46, p = 0.035). Only 3.27% FN cases were not hospitalized. Mean (±standard deviation, SD) time to first hospitalization was 8.21 ± 2.44 days. Mean (±SD) duration of hospitalization for patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 4.66 ± 2.60, 4.37 ± 2.85, and 5.12 ± 2.97 days, respectively.
GCSF prophylaxis in breast cancer patients on docetaxel could reduce FN incidence and hospitalization. 4/5-day PP demonstrated similar efficacy to 7-day PP with superior saving benefits on healthcare expenditure.
比较未接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)一级预防(PP)、4/5 天 PP 或 7 天 PP 的乳腺癌患者使用多西紫杉醇时发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生率和住院情况。
我们使用香港医院药房配药数据库,在 2014 年至 2016 年间识别出 3916 名接受多西紫杉醇-环磷酰胺(TC)、多柔比星-环磷酰胺然后多西紫杉醇(AC-T)、氟尿嘧啶-表柔比星-环磷酰胺然后多西紫杉醇(FEC-T)、多西紫杉醇-卡铂-曲妥珠单抗(TJH)或多西紫杉醇-多柔比星-环磷酰胺(TAC)治疗的乳腺癌患者。患者在多西紫杉醇给药后 5 天内给予 GCSF。结局包括 FN 发生率、首次住院时间、住院率和住院时间。
在 TC 方案中,未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率(比值比,OR)分别为 21.69%、7.95%(OR 0.31,p < 0.001)和 5.33%(OR 0.20,p < 0.001)。在 TJH 方案中,未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率分别为 38.26%、8.33%(OR 0.15,p < 0.001)和 8.57%(OR 0.15,p < 0.001)。AC-T 方案中未接受 PP 和 4/5 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率分别为 20.93%和 6.84%(OR 0.28,p = 0.005);FEC-T 方案的发生率分别为 9.91%和 4.77%(OR 0.46,p = 0.035)。只有 3.27%的 FN 病例未住院。首次住院时间的平均(±标准差,SD)为 8.21 ± 2.44 天。未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者平均(±SD)住院时间分别为 4.66 ± 2.60、4.37 ± 2.85 和 5.12 ± 2.97 天。
乳腺癌患者在接受多西紫杉醇治疗时使用 GCSF 预防可降低 FN 的发生率和住院率。4/5 天 PP 与 7 天 PP 具有相似的疗效,在医疗支出方面具有更好的节约效益。