Suppr超能文献

含多西紫杉醇方案的乳腺癌患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症及其相关住院治疗:预防性 G-CSF 给药持续时间的回顾性队列研究。

Febrile neutropenia and its associated hospitalization in breast cancer patients on docetaxel-containing regimen: A retrospective cohort study on duration of prophylactic GCSF administration.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

Department of Pharmacy, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3801-3812. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05111-6. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and hospitalization among breast cancer patients on docetaxel with no granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF) primary prophylaxis (PP), 4/5-day PP, or 7-day PP.

METHODS

We identified 3916 breast cancer patients using docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (TC), doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide then docetaxel (AC-T), fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide then docetaxel (FEC-T), docetaxel-carboplatin-trastuzumab (TJH), or docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (TAC) from a hospital pharmacy dispensing database in Hong Kong between 2014 and 2016. Patients were offered GCSF within 5 days since administering docetaxel. Outcomes included FN incidence, time to first hospitalization, hospitalization rate, and duration.

RESULTS

In TC regimen, FN incidence (with odds ratio, OR) of patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 21.69%, 7.95% (OR 0.31, p < 0.001), and 5.33% (OR 0.20, p < 0.001), respectively. In TJH regimen, FN incidence of patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 38.26%, 8.33% (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), and 8.57% (OR 0.15, p < 0.001), respectively. FN incidence of patients on AC-T regimen with no PP and 4/5-day PP was 20.93% and 6.84%, respectively (OR 0.28, p = 0.005); with FEC-T regimen, the incidence was 9.91% and 4.77%, respectively (OR 0.46, p = 0.035). Only 3.27% FN cases were not hospitalized. Mean (±standard deviation, SD) time to first hospitalization was 8.21 ± 2.44 days. Mean (±SD) duration of hospitalization for patients with no PP, 4/5-day PP, and 7-day PP was 4.66 ± 2.60, 4.37 ± 2.85, and 5.12 ± 2.97 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

GCSF prophylaxis in breast cancer patients on docetaxel could reduce FN incidence and hospitalization. 4/5-day PP demonstrated similar efficacy to 7-day PP with superior saving benefits on healthcare expenditure.

摘要

目的

比较未接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)一级预防(PP)、4/5 天 PP 或 7 天 PP 的乳腺癌患者使用多西紫杉醇时发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生率和住院情况。

方法

我们使用香港医院药房配药数据库,在 2014 年至 2016 年间识别出 3916 名接受多西紫杉醇-环磷酰胺(TC)、多柔比星-环磷酰胺然后多西紫杉醇(AC-T)、氟尿嘧啶-表柔比星-环磷酰胺然后多西紫杉醇(FEC-T)、多西紫杉醇-卡铂-曲妥珠单抗(TJH)或多西紫杉醇-多柔比星-环磷酰胺(TAC)治疗的乳腺癌患者。患者在多西紫杉醇给药后 5 天内给予 GCSF。结局包括 FN 发生率、首次住院时间、住院率和住院时间。

结果

在 TC 方案中,未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率(比值比,OR)分别为 21.69%、7.95%(OR 0.31,p < 0.001)和 5.33%(OR 0.20,p < 0.001)。在 TJH 方案中,未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率分别为 38.26%、8.33%(OR 0.15,p < 0.001)和 8.57%(OR 0.15,p < 0.001)。AC-T 方案中未接受 PP 和 4/5 天 PP 的患者 FN 发生率分别为 20.93%和 6.84%(OR 0.28,p = 0.005);FEC-T 方案的发生率分别为 9.91%和 4.77%(OR 0.46,p = 0.035)。只有 3.27%的 FN 病例未住院。首次住院时间的平均(±标准差,SD)为 8.21 ± 2.44 天。未接受 PP、4/5 天 PP 和 7 天 PP 的患者平均(±SD)住院时间分别为 4.66 ± 2.60、4.37 ± 2.85 和 5.12 ± 2.97 天。

结论

乳腺癌患者在接受多西紫杉醇治疗时使用 GCSF 预防可降低 FN 的发生率和住院率。4/5 天 PP 与 7 天 PP 具有相似的疗效,在医疗支出方面具有更好的节约效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验