Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1645 W. Jackson Blvd., Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Center on Mental Health Services Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, 1601 W. Taylor St., MCE 912, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
J Behav Med. 2020 Oct;43(5):791-806. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00123-3. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
Previous research has shown that African Americans (AA) report higher pain intensity and pain interference than other racial/ethnic groups as well as greater levels of other risk factors related to worse pain outcomes, including PTSD symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and sleep disturbance. Within a Conservation of Resources theory framework, we tested the hypothesis that socioeconomic status (SES) factors (i.e., income, education, employment, perception of income meeting basic needs) largely account for these racial/ethnic differences. Participants were 435 women [AA, 59.1%; Hispanic/Latina (HL), 25.3%; Non-Hispanic/White (NHW), 15.6%] who presented to an Emergency Department (ED) with an acute pain-related complaint. Data were extracted from psychosocial questionnaires completed at the participants' baseline interview. Structural equation modeling was used to examine whether racial/ethnic differences in pain intensity and pain interference were mediated by PTSD symptoms, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality, and sleep duration, and whether these mediation pathways were, in turn, accounted for by SES factors. Results indicated that SES factors accounted for the mediation relationships linking AA race to pain intensity via PTSD symptoms and the mediation relationships linking AA race to pain interference via PTSD symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and sleep quality. Results suggested that observed racial/ethnic differences in AA women's pain intensity, pain interference, and common risk factors for elevated pain may be largely due to racial/ethnic differences in SES. These findings highlight the role of social inequality in persistent health disparities facing inner-city, AA women.
先前的研究表明,非裔美国人(AA)报告的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰程度高于其他种族/族裔群体,以及与更糟糕的疼痛结果相关的其他风险因素水平更高,包括创伤后应激障碍症状、疼痛灾难化和睡眠障碍。在资源保护理论框架内,我们检验了这样一个假设,即社会经济地位(SES)因素(即收入、教育、就业、对收入满足基本需求的感知)在很大程度上解释了这些种族/族裔差异。参与者为 435 名女性[AA,59.1%;西班牙裔/拉丁裔(HL),25.3%;非西班牙裔/白人(NHW),15.6%],她们因急性疼痛相关疾病到急诊室就诊。数据取自参与者基线访谈时完成的心理社会问卷。结构方程模型用于检验疼痛强度和疼痛干扰的种族/族裔差异是否通过创伤后应激障碍症状、疼痛灾难化、睡眠质量和睡眠时间来介导,以及这些中介途径是否反过来由 SES 因素来解释。结果表明,SES 因素解释了 AA 种族与疼痛强度之间通过创伤后应激障碍症状的中介关系,以及 AA 种族与疼痛干扰之间通过创伤后应激障碍症状、疼痛灾难化和睡眠质量的中介关系。结果表明,AA 女性疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和常见的疼痛升高风险因素的观察到的种族/族裔差异可能在很大程度上归因于 SES 的种族/族裔差异。这些发现强调了社会不平等在城市中心区 AA 女性面临的持续健康差异中的作用。