• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤药物的可负担性:预算影响估计的准确性。

Affordability of oncology drugs: accuracy of budget impact estimations.

作者信息

Geenen Joost W, Jut Mark, Boersma Cornelis, Klungel Olaf H, Hövels Anke M

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Health-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Nov 30;8(1):1697558. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1697558. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/20016689.2019.1697558
PMID:31839908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6896423/
Abstract

: In many countries, Budget Impact (BI) informs reimbursement decisions. Evidence has shown that decision-makers have restricted access based on high BI estimates but studies show that BI estimates are often inaccurate. : To assess the accuracy of BI estimations used for informing access decisions on oncology drugs in the Netherlands.  Oncology products for which European Medicines Agency Marketing Authorisation was granted between 1-1-2000 and 1-10-2017 were selected. Observed BI data were provided by FarmInform. BI estimates were extracted from the reimbursement dossiers of the Dutch Healthcare Institute. Products without an estimated BI in the reimbursement dossier were excluded. Accuracy is defined as the ratio observed BI/estimated BI. General community, the Netherlands. : Ten products were included in the base case analysis. Mean accuracy was 0.64 and observed BI deviated by more than 40% and 100% from the estimated BI for 4 and 5 products, respectively. For all products together, €141 million BI was estimated and €82 million BI was observed, a €59 million difference. : The findings indicate that BI estimates for oncology drugs in the Netherlands are inaccurate. The role and use of BI in reimbursement decisions for these potentially life-saving drugs should therefore be considered carefully, as well as BI estimation methodology.

摘要

在许多国家,预算影响(BI)为报销决策提供依据。有证据表明,决策者会基于较高的BI估计来限制药品准入,但研究表明,BI估计往往不准确。:评估用于为荷兰肿瘤药物准入决策提供依据的BI估计的准确性。选择了2000年1月1日至2017年10月1日期间获得欧洲药品管理局上市许可的肿瘤产品。观察到的BI数据由FarmInform提供。BI估计值从荷兰医疗保健研究所的报销档案中提取。报销档案中没有估计BI的产品被排除。准确性定义为观察到的BI/估计的BI的比率。荷兰普通社区。:基础案例分析纳入了10种产品。平均准确性为0.64,分别有4种和5种产品观察到的BI与估计的BI偏差超过40%和100%。所有产品加起来,估计BI为1.41亿欧元,观察到的BI为8200万欧元,相差5900万欧元。:研究结果表明,荷兰肿瘤药物的BI估计不准确。因此,在这些可能挽救生命的药物的报销决策中,应仔细考虑BI的作用和用途,以及BI估计方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd5/6896423/b2801351d372/ZJMA_A_1697558_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd5/6896423/30773eee4852/ZJMA_A_1697558_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd5/6896423/b2801351d372/ZJMA_A_1697558_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd5/6896423/30773eee4852/ZJMA_A_1697558_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd5/6896423/b2801351d372/ZJMA_A_1697558_F0002_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Affordability of oncology drugs: accuracy of budget impact estimations.肿瘤药物的可负担性:预算影响估计的准确性。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Nov 30;8(1):1697558. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1697558. eCollection 2020.
2
Accuracy of budget impact estimations and impact on patient access: a hepatitis C case study.预算影响估计的准确性及其对患者可及性的影响:丙型肝炎案例研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):857-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01048-z. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
A novel method for predicting the budget impact of innovative medicines: validation study for oncolytics.一种预测创新药物预算影响的新方法:肿瘤药物验证研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):845-853. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01176-x. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
4
5
Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe.比较欧洲罕见病药物的可及性。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 May 3;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5.
6
Reimbursement of Orphan Drugs in Europe in Relation to the Type of Authorization by the European Medicines Agency and the Decision Making Based on Health Technology Assessment.欧洲孤儿药报销与欧洲药品管理局的授权类型及基于卫生技术评估的决策之关系
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 12;9:1263. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01263. eCollection 2018.
7
Impact of orphan drugs on Latvian budget.罕见病药物对拉脱维亚预算的影响。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 May 11;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0434-y.
8
Balancing early access with uncertainties in evidence for drugs authorized by prospective case series - systematic review of reimbursement decisions.平衡前瞻性病例系列授权药物证据中的不确定性与早期获取 - 报销决策的系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;84(6):1146-1155. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13531. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Value Insider Season 1 Episode 3: How Does Budget Impact and Affordability in Healthcare Work? (BI and Affordability) [Podcast].《价值洞察》第一季第三集:预算如何影响医疗保健的可及性与可负担性?(商业智能与可负担性)[播客]
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Oct 26;15:7879-7884. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S390689. eCollection 2022.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.罕见病药物预算影响分析的方法学质量评估:一项系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;12:630949. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.630949. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of budget impact estimations and impact on patient access: a hepatitis C case study.预算影响估计的准确性及其对患者可及性的影响:丙型肝炎案例研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):857-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01048-z. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.与全威尔士药品战略小组推荐药品相关的预计支出与实际支出对比
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5.
3
Approaches to manage 'affordability' of high budget impact medicines in key EU countries.
欧盟主要国家管理高预算影响药品“可负担性”的方法。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Jun 8;6(1):1478539. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1478539. eCollection 2018.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Position Statement on Addressing the Affordability of Cancer Drugs.美国临床肿瘤学会关于解决抗癌药物可及性的立场声明。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar;14(3):187-192. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.027359. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
The use of budget impact analysis in the economic evaluation of new medicines in Australia, England, France and the United States: relationship to cost-effectiveness analysis and methodological challenges.预算影响分析在澳大利亚、英国、法国和美国新药经济评估中的应用:与成本效益分析的关系及方法学挑战。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):173-175. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0933-3. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
6
Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society?-lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund.高成本癌症药物的患者准入方案是否为社会带来了价值?——来自英国国家医疗服务体系癌症药物基金的经验教训。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1738-1750. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx110.
7
Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future.肿瘤药物的准入管理协议:欧洲经验对未来的启示
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 4;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00171. eCollection 2017.
8
Systematic bias in predictions of new drugs' budget impact: analysis of a sample of recent US drug launches.新药预算影响预测中的系统偏差:对近期美国新药上市样本的分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):765-773. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1320276. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
The high price of anticancer drugs: origins, implications, barriers, solutions.抗癌药物的高昂价格:起源、影响、障碍、解决方案。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;14(6):381-390. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.31. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
10
Payers' experiences with confidential pharmaceutical price discounts: A survey of public and statutory health systems in North America, Europe, and Australasia.付款方对药品保密价格折扣的体验:对北美、欧洲和澳大拉西亚公共及法定医疗系统的一项调查。
Health Policy. 2017 Apr;121(4):354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.