• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟主要国家管理高预算影响药品“可负担性”的方法。

Approaches to manage 'affordability' of high budget impact medicines in key EU countries.

作者信息

Flume Mathias, Bardou Marc, Capri Stefano, Sola-Morales Oriol, Cunningham David, Levin Lars-Ake, Postma Maarten J, Touchot Nicolas

机构信息

Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Westfalen-Lippe (KVWL), Dortmund, Germany.

CIC INSERM 1432, CHU CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon Cedex, France.

出版信息

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Jun 8;6(1):1478539. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1478539. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1080/20016689.2018.1478539
PMID:29915664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5998770/
Abstract

The launch of hepatitis C (HCV) drugs such as sofosbuvir or ledipasvir has fostered the question of affordability of novel high budget impact therapies even in countries with high domestic product. European countries have developed a variety of mechanisms to improve affordability of such therapies, including 'affordability thresholds', price volume agreements or caps on individual product sales, and special budgets for innovative drugs. While some of these mechanisms may help limit budget impact, there are still significant progresses to be made in the definition and implementation of approaches to ensure affordability, especially in health systems where the growth potential in drug spending and/or in the patient contribution to health insurance are limited.  In this article, we will review how seven countries in western Europe are approaching the question of affordability of novel therapies and are developing approaches to continue to reward new sciences while limiting budget impact. We will also discuss the question of affordability of cost-effective but hugely expensive therapies and the implications for payers and for the pharmaceutical industry. There is clearly not one solution that is used consistently across countries but rather a number of 'tools' that are combined differently in each country. This illustrates the difficulty of managing affordability within different legal frameworks and within different health care system architectures.

摘要

索非布韦或雷迪帕韦等丙型肝炎(HCV)药物的推出引发了一个问题,即即便在国内生产总值较高的国家,新型高预算影响疗法的可负担性如何。欧洲国家已制定了多种机制来提高此类疗法的可负担性,包括“可负担性阈值”、价格-数量协议或对单个产品销售的上限,以及创新药物专项预算。虽然其中一些机制可能有助于限制预算影响,但在确保可负担性的方法的定义和实施方面仍有很大进展空间,尤其是在药品支出增长潜力和/或患者对医疗保险贡献有限的卫生系统中。在本文中,我们将审视西欧七个国家如何应对新型疗法的可负担性问题,以及如何制定方法在限制预算影响的同时继续奖励新科学。我们还将讨论具有成本效益但极其昂贵的疗法的可负担性问题以及对支付方和制药行业的影响。显然,各国并非始终采用一种统一的解决方案,而是在每个国家以不同方式组合使用多种“工具”。这说明了在不同法律框架和不同医疗保健系统架构内管理可负担性的难度。

相似文献

1
Approaches to manage 'affordability' of high budget impact medicines in key EU countries.欧盟主要国家管理高预算影响药品“可负担性”的方法。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Jun 8;6(1):1478539. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1478539. eCollection 2018.
2
Defining and Measuring the Affordability of New Medicines: A Systematic Review.定义和衡量新药的可负担性:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0514-4.
3
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Paying for Cures: Perspectives on Solutions to the "Affordability Issue".为治愈买单:关于“可负担性问题”解决方案的观点
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.013.
5
Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020.估算欧洲孤儿药的预算影响:2010-2020 年。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Sep 27;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-62.
6
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
7
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States.索磷布韦和来迪帕司韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒在美国的成本效益和预算影响
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):397-406. doi: 10.7326/M14-1336.
8
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?支付孤儿药系统费用:是坚持还是妥协?是否到了欧洲的支付方采用新的评估体系来考虑新的罕见病治疗方法的时候了?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 26;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.
9
Thresholds for decision-making: informing the cost-effectiveness and affordability of rotavirus vaccines in Malaysia.决策阈值:为马来西亚轮状病毒疫苗的成本效益和可负担性提供信息。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Mar 1;33(2):204-214. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx166.
10
Accelerating patient access to oncology medicines with multiple indications in Europe.加快欧洲患者获取具有多种适应症的肿瘤药物的速度。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Aug 17;9(1):1964791. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.1964791. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
A 2024 global report on national policies, programmes, and progress towards hepatitis C elimination: findings from 33 hepatitis elimination profiles.一份关于丙型肝炎消除的国家政策、计划及进展的2024年全球报告:来自33份肝炎消除概况的调查结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul;10(7):685-700. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00068-8. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
Mapping methods gaps between EU joint clinical assessments and local health technology assessment decision-making: an environmental scan of guidance in select EU markets and harmonization challenges.绘制欧盟联合临床评估与地方卫生技术评估决策之间的方法差距:对部分欧盟市场指南及协调挑战的环境扫描
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 May;14(5):e240240. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0240. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
3
HTA Reshaping: Rethinking the Health Technology Assessment Framework in Portugal.卫生技术评估重塑:重新思考葡萄牙的卫生技术评估框架
Port J Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;39(1):36-47. doi: 10.1159/000516501. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
The ethics of aggregation in cost-effectiveness analysis or, "on books, bookshelves, and budget impact".成本效益分析中的汇总伦理,或“关于书籍、书架与预算影响”
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 13;2:889423. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.889423. eCollection 2022.
5
Critical Reflections on Reimbursement and Access of Advanced Therapies.对先进疗法报销与可及性的批判性思考
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 18;13:771966. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.771966. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessing the Accuracy of Sales Forecasts Submitted by Pharmaceutical Companies Applying for Reimbursement in Austria.评估申请奥地利报销的制药公司提交的销售预测的准确性。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 13;12:726758. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.726758. eCollection 2021.
7
A novel method for predicting the budget impact of innovative medicines: validation study for oncolytics.一种预测创新药物预算影响的新方法:肿瘤药物验证研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):845-853. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01176-x. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
8
Affordability of oncology drugs: accuracy of budget impact estimations.肿瘤药物的可负担性:预算影响估计的准确性。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Nov 30;8(1):1697558. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1697558. eCollection 2020.
9
Accuracy of budget impact estimations and impact on patient access: a hepatitis C case study.预算影响估计的准确性及其对患者可及性的影响:丙型肝炎案例研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):857-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01048-z. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
2
Cost-Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcomes of Sovaldi (SOFOSBUVIR) for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infected (HCV) Patients from a Swedish Societal Perspective.从瑞典社会视角看索华迪(索磷布韦)治疗慢性丙型肝炎感染(HCV)患者的成本效益及长期疗效
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A675. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2508. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
3
Pharmaceutical Policy Reform--Balancing Affordability with Incentives for Innovation.药品政策改革——平衡可负担性与创新激励
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):703-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1515068.
4
Do the current performance-based schemes in Italy really work? "Success fee": a novel measure for cost-containment of drug expenditure.意大利当前基于绩效的方案真的有效吗?“成功费”:一种控制药品支出成本的新措施。
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 11.