• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与全威尔士药品战略小组推荐药品相关的预计支出与实际支出对比

Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.

作者信息

Keeping Stuart, Deslandes Paul N, Haines Kathryn E, Routledge Philip A

机构信息

All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Llandough, CF64 2XX, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5
PMID:30656545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710308/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) appraises the clinical and cost effectiveness of new medicines being considered for National Health Service (NHS) prescribing in Wales (UK). The aim of this study was to compare the estimated expenditure on selected medicines submitted by pharmaceutical companies for appraisal with the observed expenditure on these medicines following recommendation.

METHODS

Medicines appraised and recommended for use in NHS Wales by AWMSG between May 2005 and December 2013 were identified for inclusion in the study. Estimates of expenditure were obtained from company submissions to AWMSG. Primary and secondary care dispensing databases were used to obtain observed expenditure. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the observed and estimated expenditure in each of the 3 years after introduction of the medicine.

RESULTS

Forty-nine medicines appraised and recommended by AWMSG during the period of interest were included in the study. Median estimated and observed expenditure in each of the 3 years post-recommendation were as follows: year 1 £86,400 and £47,300; year 2 £175,500 and £73,200; year 3 £212,100 and £78,900 (p = 0.03, p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). The expenditure on 42 of the 49 medicines (82%) was overestimated in at least one of the 3 years post-introduction, with 32 (65%) overestimated in all 3 years.

CONCLUSION

In their applications for health technology appraisal, pharmaceutical companies tended to overestimate the expenditure of the majority of medicines recommended by AWMSG. These findings have implications for the assessment of predicted expenditure as part of the process of medicines appraisal in Wales.

摘要

目标

全威尔士药品战略小组(AWMSG)评估威尔士国民医疗服务体系(NHS,英国)考虑用于处方的新药的临床和成本效益。本研究的目的是比较制药公司提交评估的特定药品的估计支出与推荐后这些药品的实际支出。

方法

确定2005年5月至2013年12月期间由AWMSG评估并推荐在威尔士NHS使用的药品纳入研究。支出估计数来自公司提交给AWMSG的材料。使用初级和二级医疗配药数据库获取实际支出。采用Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验比较药品引入后3年中每年的实际支出和估计支出。

结果

研究纳入了感兴趣期间由AWMSG评估并推荐的49种药品。推荐后3年中每年的估计支出中位数和实际支出中位数如下:第1年分别为86,400英镑和47,300英镑;第2年分别为175,500英镑和73,200英镑;第3年分别为212,100英镑和78,900英镑(p值分别为0.03、0.006和0.001)。49种药品中有42种(82%)在引入后的3年中至少有1年支出被高估,其中32种(65%)在所有3年中均被高估。

结论

在健康技术评估申请中,制药公司往往高估了AWMSG推荐的大多数药品的支出。这些发现对威尔士药品评估过程中预测支出的评估有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/e860d6259fd1/41669_2019_116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/ef5667c8ed17/41669_2019_116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/dbc42748a2fa/41669_2019_116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/e860d6259fd1/41669_2019_116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/ef5667c8ed17/41669_2019_116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/dbc42748a2fa/41669_2019_116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eda6/6710308/e860d6259fd1/41669_2019_116_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.与全威尔士药品战略小组推荐药品相关的预计支出与实际支出对比
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5.
2
New Medicines in Wales: The All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) Appraisal Process and Outcomes.威尔士的新药:全威尔士药品策略组(AWMSG)评估程序与结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0632-7.
3
Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.决策者对威尔士批准新药的偏好:一项具有外部有效性评估的离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Apr;31(4):345-55. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0030-0.
4
The All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: 18 years' experience of a national medicines optimisation committee.全威尔士药物策略组:国家药物优化委员会 18 年的经验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;87(10):3961-3970. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14817. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
Reimbursement decisions of the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group: influence of policy and clinical and economic factors.全威尔士药品策略组的报销决策:政策及临床和经济因素的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Sep 1;30(9):779-94. doi: 10.2165/11591530-000000000-00000.
6
Opportunity costs and local health service spending decisions: a qualitative study from Wales.机会成本与地方卫生服务支出决策:来自威尔士的一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 25;16:103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1354-1.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Cabazitaxel for Hormone-Relapsed Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Docetaxel-Containing Regimen: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.卡巴他赛用于先前接受含多西他赛方案治疗的激素难治性转移性前列腺癌:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估的证据审查小组观点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0457-1.
9
Ixekizumab for Treating Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.依奇珠单抗治疗中重度斑块状银屑病:NICE 单技术评估的循证评估组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):917-927. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0629-2.
10
The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.英国制药市场。概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:14-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Budget impact models for lung cancer interventions: A systematic literature review.肺癌干预措施的预算影响模型:系统文献回顾。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Sep;30(9):1041-1056. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.9.1041.
2
Budget Impact Analysis of Risperidone Use and Adverse Event Monitoring in Autism Spectrum Disorder in Brazil: Assessment of Theoretical Versus Real Data.巴西自闭症谱系障碍中使用利培酮及不良事件监测的预算影响分析:理论数据与实际数据的评估
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Nov;7(6):951-961. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00436-9. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Prescribing costs of hypoglycaemic agents and associations with metabolic control in Wales; a national analysis of primary care data.

本文引用的文献

1
New Medicines in Wales: The All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) Appraisal Process and Outcomes.威尔士的新药:全威尔士药品策略组(AWMSG)评估程序与结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0632-7.
2
Systematic bias in predictions of new drugs' budget impact: analysis of a sample of recent US drug launches.新药预算影响预测中的系统偏差:对近期美国新药上市样本的分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):765-773. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1320276. Epub 2017 May 3.
3
Pharmaceutical forecasting: throwing darts?
威尔士低血糖药物处方费用与代谢控制的关系:基于初级保健数据的全国分析。
Diabet Med. 2022 Sep;39(9):e14908. doi: 10.1111/dme.14908. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Assessing the Accuracy of Sales Forecasts Submitted by Pharmaceutical Companies Applying for Reimbursement in Austria.评估申请奥地利报销的制药公司提交的销售预测的准确性。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 13;12:726758. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.726758. eCollection 2021.
5
A novel method for predicting the budget impact of innovative medicines: validation study for oncolytics.一种预测创新药物预算影响的新方法:肿瘤药物验证研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):845-853. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01176-x. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
6
Affordability of oncology drugs: accuracy of budget impact estimations.肿瘤药物的可负担性:预算影响估计的准确性。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Nov 30;8(1):1697558. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1697558. eCollection 2020.
药品预测:像掷飞镖一样随意?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Oct;12(10):737-8. doi: 10.1038/nrd4127.