Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):814-822. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32593. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
Patients with cancer-related pain are underrepresented in the opioid literature despite high opioid exposure and numerous risk factors for adverse opioid outcomes, including unnecessary persistent opioid use. The objective of this study was to determine the extent, historical trends, and predictors of new-onset persistent opioid use among older adult women after active breast cancer treatment.
Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data for opioid-naive women diagnosed with stage 0 to III breast cancer at the age of 66 to 90 years between 2008 and 2013, this study estimated overall and quarterly adjusted probabilities of new-onset persistent opioid use, which was defined as receiving ≥90 days' supply of opioids in the year after active breast cancer treatment. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with an alternative definition of persistent opioid use: any opioid fill 90 to 180 days after active cancer treatment.
Nearly two-thirds of the subjects received prescription opioid therapy during cancer treatment. Quarterly probabilities of new-onset persistent opioid use after active treatment ranged from 2% to 4%; in sensitivity analyses, the alternative outcome definition resulted in predicted probabilities ranging from 11.4% to 14.7%. Subjects with more advanced disease, a higher comorbidity burden, a low-income status, and greater opioid exposure during active cancer treatment were more likely to develop persistent opioid use.
Persistent opioid use was an infrequent occurrence among older adult patients with breast cancer completing cancer treatment between 2008 and 2013. This finding was encouraging because of the concerning opioid trends seen in noncancer populations. However, opportunities to further mitigate unsafe opioid use as a complication of cancer care, including standardization of persistent opioid use definitions, should be explored.
尽管癌症相关疼痛患者的阿片类药物暴露率高,且存在许多导致阿片类药物不良结局的风险因素,包括不必要的持续阿片类药物使用,但他们在阿片类药物文献中的代表性不足。本研究的目的是确定在积极的乳腺癌治疗后,老年女性新发持续性阿片类药物使用的程度、历史趋势和预测因素。
本研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库,纳入了 2008 年至 2013 年间年龄在 66 至 90 岁、诊断为 0 至 III 期乳腺癌且初次使用阿片类药物的女性,估计新发性持续性阿片类药物使用的总体和季度调整概率,定义为在积极治疗乳腺癌后的一年内接受≥90 天的阿片类药物治疗。采用替代的持续性阿片类药物使用定义(即积极癌症治疗后 90 至 180 天内的任何阿片类药物治疗)进行敏感性分析。
近三分之二的患者在癌症治疗期间接受了处方阿片类药物治疗。积极治疗后新发持续性阿片类药物使用的季度概率为 2%至 4%;在敏感性分析中,替代结局定义的预测概率为 11.4%至 14.7%。疾病进展程度较高、合并症负担较重、收入较低和在积极癌症治疗期间阿片类药物暴露量较大的患者,更有可能发生持续性阿片类药物使用。
2008 年至 2013 年期间,完成癌症治疗的老年乳腺癌患者中,持续性阿片类药物使用的发生率较低。这一发现令人鼓舞,因为在非癌症人群中观察到了令人担忧的阿片类药物趋势。然而,应探索进一步减少癌症治疗中不安全阿片类药物使用的机会,包括标准化持续性阿片类药物使用定义。