Joseph P M, Shetty A
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6086.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1988 Jul-Aug;6(4):421-30. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90479-1.
We report on a comparative study of two methods of chemical shift imaging which can be used to selectively image fat and water in vivo. Both methods require a B0 field sufficiently homogenous to resolve the methylene and water spectral lines. One method, called CHESS, uses a chemically selective pulse to saturate the unwanted spectral line. The other method, called SECSI, achieves chemical selectivity by using a soft 180 degree RF pulse in forming a spin echo image. Both methods require that the strength of the B1 RF field be accurately calibrated and homogenous. We show by theoretical analysis that the suppression of unwanted spectral lines is sensitive to the first power of B1 errors in the CHESS method but to the second power of B1 errors in the SECSI method. Experiments with phantoms confirmed the expected non linearity of the SECSI method, and showed superior water suppression factors in phantoms with it. Experiments with a large phantom and a living rabbit showed superior results using the SECSI method, and the best results were obtained using a combination of the two techniques.
我们报告了两种化学位移成像方法的比较研究,这两种方法可用于在体内选择性地对脂肪和水进行成像。两种方法都需要一个足够均匀的B0场,以分辨亚甲基和水的谱线。一种方法称为CHESS,使用化学选择性脉冲使不需要的谱线饱和。另一种方法称为SECSI,通过在形成自旋回波图像时使用软180度射频脉冲来实现化学选择性。两种方法都要求准确校准并使B1射频场的强度均匀。我们通过理论分析表明,在CHESS方法中,不需要的谱线的抑制对B1误差的一次幂敏感,而在SECSI方法中对B1误差的二次幂敏感。用体模进行的实验证实了SECSI方法预期的非线性,并表明在体模中使用该方法具有更好的水抑制因子。用大型体模和活兔进行的实验表明,使用SECSI方法有更好的结果,而将两种技术结合使用可获得最佳结果。