Suppr超能文献

从患者角度审视急诊医学:对一项患者回访计划一年情况的分析

Calling on the Patient's Perspective in Emergency Medicine: Analysis of 1 Year of a Patient Callback Program.

作者信息

Natsui Shaw, Aaronson Emily L, Joseph Tony A, Goldsmith Andrew J, Sonis Jonathan D, Raja Ali S, White Benjamin A, Luciani-Mcgillivray Ines, Mort Elizabeth

机构信息

Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2019 Dec;6(4):318-324. doi: 10.1177/2374373518805542. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered approaches in the evaluation of patient experience are increasingly important priorities for quality improvement in health-care delivery. Our objective was to investigate common themes in patient-reported data to better understand areas for improvement in the emergency department (ED) experience.

METHODS

A large urban, tertiary-care ED conducted phone interviews with 2607 patients who visited the ED during 2015. Patients were asked to identify one area that would have significantly improved their visit. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis, and the results were summarized with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The most commonly cited themes for improvement in the patient experience were wait time (49.4%) and communication (14.6%). Related, but more nuanced, themes emerged around the perception of ED crowding and compassionate care as additional important contributors to the patient experience. Other frequently cited factors contributing to a negative experience were the discharge process and inability to complete follow-up plan (8.0%), environmental factors (7.9%), perceived competency of providers in the evaluation or treatment (7.4%), and pain management (7.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Wait times and perceptions of ED crowding, as well as provider communication and compassionate care, are significant factors identified by patients that affect their ED experience.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的患者体验评估方法在改善医疗服务质量方面日益成为重要的优先事项。我们的目标是调查患者报告数据中的常见主题,以更好地了解急诊科(ED)体验中有待改善的领域。

方法

一家大型城市三级护理急诊科对2015年期间前来就诊的2607名患者进行了电话访谈。患者被要求指出一个能显著改善其就诊体验的领域。使用内容分析法对访谈记录进行分析,并通过描述性统计对结果进行总结。

结果

患者体验改善方面最常被提及的主题是等待时间(49.4%)和沟通(14.6%)。围绕急诊科拥挤的感知和关怀护理出现了相关但更细微的主题,这些也是影响患者体验的重要因素。导致负面体验的其他常见因素包括出院流程和无法完成后续计划(8.0%)、环境因素(7.9%)、对医护人员评估或治疗能力的感知(7.4%)以及疼痛管理(7.4%)。

结论

等待时间、对急诊科拥挤的感知以及医护人员的沟通和关怀护理是患者确定的影响其急诊科体验的重要因素。

相似文献

1
Calling on the Patient's Perspective in Emergency Medicine: Analysis of 1 Year of a Patient Callback Program.
J Patient Exp. 2019 Dec;6(4):318-324. doi: 10.1177/2374373518805542. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Emergency Department Patient Experience: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
J Patient Exp. 2018 Jun;5(2):101-106. doi: 10.1177/2374373517731359. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
3
The effect of crowding on access and quality in an academic ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;24(7):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.026.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Framework for analyzing wait times and other factors that impact patient satisfaction in the emergency department.
J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;41(6):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.01.018. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
6
Availability of Emergency Department Wait Times Information: A Patient-Centered Needs Assessment.
Emerg Med Int. 2021 Apr 22;2021:8883933. doi: 10.1155/2021/8883933. eCollection 2021.
7
Lessons learned from piloting a pain assessment program for high frequency emergency department users.
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jul 26;19(3):545-552. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0128.
8
Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1016-21. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235be06.

引用本文的文献

3
Patient Suggestions to Improve Emergency Physician Empathy and Communication.
J Patient Exp. 2021 Feb 25;8:2374373521996981. doi: 10.1177/2374373521996981. eCollection 2021.
4
Nurse-Led Call Back Program to Improve Patient Follow-Up With Providers After Discharge From the Emergency Department.
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1349-1356. doi: 10.1177/2374373520947925. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Patient Feedback on Research Studies: How to Interpret Feedback from the 'Aware' Patient?
Patient. 2021 Jan;14(1):147-148. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00469-w. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Department Postdischarge Phone Calls: Lessons Learned.
J Emerg Nurs. 2017 Nov;43(6):581-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.07.015.
2
Incident Reporting in Emergency Medicine: A Thematic Analysis of Events.
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):e60-e63. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000399.
4
Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3597-2. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
5
A comprehensive view of parental satisfaction with pediatric emergency department visits.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;62(4):340-50. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.025. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
The application of hospitality elements in hospitals.
J Healthc Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1):47-62; discussion 62-3.
8
The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality.
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):405-11. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
Emergency department crowding and risk of preventable medical errors.
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0702-8. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验