Suppr超能文献

建立关于身体活动对认知益处的科学共识。

Establishing a Scientific Consensus on the Cognitive Benefits of Physical Activity.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010029.

Abstract

Research suggests that physical activity can be used as an intervention to increase cognitive function. Yet, there are competing views on the cognitive effects of physical activity and it is not clear what level of consensus exists among researchers in the field. The purpose of this study was two-fold: Firstly, to quantify the scientific consensus by focusing on the relationship between physical activity and cognitive function. Secondly, to investigate if there is a gap between the public's and scientists' interpretations of scientific texts on this topic. A two-phase study was performed by including 75 scientists in the first phase and 15 non-scientists in the second phase. Participants were asked to categorize article abstracts in terms of endorsement of the effect of physical activity on cognitive function. Results indicated that there was a 76.1% consensus that physical activity has positive cognitive effects. There was a consistent association between scientists' and non-scientists' categorizations, suggesting that both groups perceived abstracts in a similar fashion. Taken together, this study provides the first analysis of its kind to evaluate the level of consensus in almost two decades of research. The present data can be used to inform further research and practice.

摘要

研究表明,身体活动可以作为一种干预措施,提高认知功能。然而,对于身体活动对认知的影响存在相互矛盾的观点,并且不清楚该领域的研究人员之间存在多大程度的共识。本研究有两个目的:首先,通过关注身体活动与认知功能之间的关系,来量化科学共识。其次,研究公众和科学家对这一主题的科学文本的解释是否存在差距。本研究采用两阶段研究,第一阶段纳入 75 名科学家,第二阶段纳入 15 名非科学家。要求参与者根据身体活动对认知功能影响的赞同程度对文章摘要进行分类。结果表明,有 76.1%的共识认为身体活动有积极的认知效果。科学家和非科学家的分类之间存在一致的关联,这表明这两个群体以相似的方式感知摘要。总之,这项研究首次分析了近二十年来研究中共识的水平。目前的数据可用于为进一步的研究和实践提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac9c/6981850/68c74235cd2a/ijerph-17-00029-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验