Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Mar 2;86(6). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02101-19.
Increasing evidence exists for the role that cattle play in the epidemiology of campylobacteriosis. In this study, the prevalence and distribution of were longitudinally examined at the subspecies level in the beef cattle production continuum. Animals were subdivided into two groups: those that were not administered antibiotics and those that were administered the antimicrobial growth promoter chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (AS700). Samples were longitudinally collected throughout the confined feeding operation (CFO) period and during the slaughter process, and was isolated and genotyped to assess subtype richness and to elucidate transmission dynamics from farm to fork. The bacterium was frequently isolated from cattle, and the bacterial densities shed in feces increased over the CFO period. was also isolated from digesta, hides, the abattoir environment, and carcasses. The administration of AS700 did not conspicuously reduce the densities in feces or within the intestine but significantly reduced the bacterial densities and the diversity of subtypes on abattoir samples. All cattle carried multiple subtypes, including clinically relevant subtypes known to represent a risk to human health. Instances of intra-animal longitudinal transmission were observed. Although clinically relevant subtypes were transmitted to carcasses via direct contact and aerosols, the bacterium could not be isolated nor could its DNA be detected in ground beef regardless of treatment. Although the evidence indicated that beef cattle represent a significant reservoir for , including high-risk subtypes strongly associated with the bovine host, they do not appear to represent a significant risk for direct foodborne transmission. This implicates alternate routes of human transmission. Limited information is available on the transmission of subtypes in the beef production continuum and the foodborne risk posed to humans. Cattle were colonized by diverse subtypes of , and the densities of the bacterium shed in feces increased during the confined feeding period. was readily associated with the digesta, feces, and hides of cattle entering the abattoir, as well as the local environment. Moreover, cells were deposited on carcasses via direct contact and aerosols, but the bacterium was not detected in the ground beef generated from contaminated carcasses. We conclude that bacterial cells associated with beef cattle do not represent a significant risk through food consumption and suggest that clinically relevant subtypes are transmitted through alternate routes of exposure.
越来越多的证据表明,牛在弯曲杆菌病的流行病学中起着重要作用。在这项研究中,在肉牛生产连续体中,从亚种下水平纵向检查了 的流行和分布。动物分为两组:未使用抗生素的组和使用抗菌生长促进剂金霉素和磺胺嘧啶(AS700)的组。在整个封闭式饲养操作(CFO)期间和屠宰过程中,纵向采集样本,并分离和基因分型 以评估亚型丰富度并阐明从农场到叉子的传播动态。该细菌经常从牛中分离出来,粪便中排出的细菌密度在 CFO 期间增加。还从消化物、皮、屠宰场环境和胴体中分离出 。AS700 的给药并没有明显降低粪便或肠道内的 密度,但显着降低了屠宰场样本上的细菌密度和亚型多样性。所有牛都携带多种亚型,包括代表人类健康风险的临床相关亚型。观察到动物内纵向传播的实例。尽管通过直接接触和气溶胶传播了与临床相关的亚型,但无论处理方式如何,都无法在碎牛肉中分离出细菌,也无法检测到其 DNA。尽管证据表明肉牛是 的重要宿主,包括与牛宿主密切相关的高风险亚型,但它们似乎不会对直接食源性传播构成重大风险。这暗示了人类传播的替代途径。关于 亚群在牛肉生产连续体中的传播以及对人类构成的食源性风险的信息有限。牛被多种 亚型定植,粪便中排出的细菌密度在封闭饲养期增加。 很容易与进入屠宰场的牛的消化物、粪便和皮联系在一起,以及当地环境。此外, 通过直接接触和气溶胶将 细胞沉积在胴体上,但未从受污染的胴体产生的碎牛肉中检测到细菌。我们得出结论,与肉牛相关的 细菌细胞不会通过食物消费构成重大风险,并表明临床相关亚型通过其他暴露途径传播。