Suppr超能文献

用于颌面外科的可生物吸收板/螺钉及钛板/螺钉对牙龈成纤维细胞和人骨髓间充质干细胞的细胞毒性评估

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of The Bioresorbable and Titanium Plates/Screws Used in Maxillofacial Surgery on Gingival Fibroblasts and Human Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Stem Cells.

作者信息

Vatani Masoud, Beigi Mohammad Hossein, Ejeian Fatemeh, Mottaghi Ahmad, Yadegari-Naeini Afshin, Nasr-Esfahani Mohammad Hossein

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Cellular Biotechnology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Cell J. 2020 Oct;22(3):310-318. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2020.6409. Epub 2019 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bioresorbable and titanium plates/screws are considered as a standard treatment for fixation of the bone segments of craniofacial area and paying attention to their biocompatibility is an important issue along with other aspects of application. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the cell viability of two types of plate and screw used in maxillofacial surgeries in contact with gingival fibroblasts and bone marrow stem cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this experimental study after extraction and cultivation of cells from healthy human gingival tissue and alveolar bone of jaw, cytotoxicity of device was evaluated. In direct contact method, samples had near vicinity contact with the both cell lines and in indirect contact method, by-products released, like ions, from samples after 8 weeks were used to assess cytotoxicity. Then cytotoxicity was evaluated on the 2, 4 and 6 day with MTS tests and microscopy. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and independent t tests.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between the German plate and screw and all the samples studied on day 6 (P<0.05). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed between both metal samples and both bio-absorbable samples on day 6 and both cell lines (P<0.05). Comparisons between the two groups with each other for both cell lines on the 6 day were statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that that cytotoxicity of biomaterial, from different brands, were not similar and some of the biomaterial showed lower degree of toxicity compared to others and specialist using these products showed be aware of this differences. Our investigation indicates more biocompatibility of bioresorbable plates and screws compared to titanium. In addition our results suggest that biomaterials were not completely neutral.

摘要

目的

生物可吸收板/螺钉和钛板/螺钉被视为颅面部骨段固定的标准治疗方法,关注它们的生物相容性以及其他应用方面是一个重要问题。本研究的目的是评估两种用于颌面外科手术的板/螺钉与牙龈成纤维细胞和骨髓干细胞接触时的细胞活力。

材料与方法

在本实验研究中,从健康人牙龈组织和颌骨牙槽骨中提取并培养细胞后,评估器械的细胞毒性。在直接接触法中,样本与两种细胞系近距离接触;在间接接触法中,8周后样本释放的副产物(如离子)用于评估细胞毒性。然后在第2、4和6天用MTS试验和显微镜评估细胞毒性。数据采用单向方差分析和独立t检验进行分析。

结果

德国产的板/螺钉与第6天研究的所有样本之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。此外,在第6天,两种金属样本和两种生物可吸收样本与两种细胞系之间均观察到统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。两种细胞系在第6天两组之间的比较具有统计学显著性(P<0.05)。

结论

我们的结果表明,不同品牌生物材料的细胞毒性不相似,一些生物材料的毒性程度低于其他材料,使用这些产品的专业人员应意识到这种差异。我们的研究表明,与钛相比,生物可吸收板/螺钉具有更高的生物相容性。此外,我们的结果表明生物材料并非完全中性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932c/6947002/dc05fc6355d4/Cell-J-22-310-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验